MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2983520902 · doi:10.1002/uog.21920

Cardiac hemodynamics in fetuses with transposition of the great arteries and intact ventricular septum from diagnosis to end of pregnancy: longitudinal follow‐up

2019· article· en· W2983520902 on OpenAlexaff
Matthias Lachaud, Audrey Dionne, M. Brassard, M. A. Charron, Ala Birca, Mathieu Dehaes, Marie‐Josée Raboisson

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreat arteriesMedicineFetusFetal echocardiographyCardiologyHemodynamicsInternal medicineGestational ageForamen ovale (heart)PregnancyPrenatal diagnosisHeart diseasePatent foramen ovale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Objectives Little is known about cardiac hemodynamics in the fetus with transposition of the great arteries and intact ventricular septum (TGA‐IVS). Better understanding of the fetal physiology in TGA‐IVS would help to provide insights into specific clinical complications observed after birth, in particular neonatal hypoxia and pulmonary hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess cardiac hemodynamics in fetuses with TGA‐IVS by performing systematic longitudinal echocardiographic follow‐up from diagnosis to delivery. Methods This was a longitudinal retrospective study of fetuses referred between 2010 and 2018 to the Sainte‐Justine University Hospital Centre. Complete assessment of cardiac hemodynamics was performed in fetuses with TGA‐IVS at 18–22, 28–32 and 35–38 weeks' gestation, which were compared with normal fetuses matched for gestational age. The maximum diameter of the foramen ovale was measured using two‐dimensional echocardiography under the guidance of color Doppler echocardiography. Fetal cardiac hemodynamics were analyzed according to postnatal preductal transcutaneous oxygen saturation (TcSO 2 ) < 65% or ≥ 65%, as a neonatal outcome, in fetuses with TGA‐IVS. Results In total, 59 fetuses with TGA‐IVS and 160 normal fetuses were included. Global cardiac output was significantly higher in fetuses with TGA‐IVS than in controls, mainly owing to higher global pulmonary output, while global systemic cardiac output did not differ between TGA‐IVS fetuses and controls throughout pregnancy. Aortic flow (right ventricular output in fetuses with TGA‐IVS, left ventricular output in controls) was significantly higher in fetuses with TGA‐IVS than in normal fetuses. Ductal flow was significantly lower in fetuses with TGA‐IVS at every timepoint, and this difference increased considerably after 28–32 weeks. In parallel, the diameter of the foramen ovale was significantly smaller in fetuses with TGA‐IVS at 28–32 and 35–38 weeks, with a stagnation in growth after 28 weeks, compared with continuous growth in normal fetuses. Most of these cardiac hemodynamic anomalies in fetuses with TGA‐IVS were already present at 18–22 weeks, and the differences became greater at 28–32 weeks' gestation. TGA‐IVS neonates with TcSO 2 < 65% had lower fetal left ventricular output, higher diastolic ductal retrograde flow and smaller foramen ovale at 28–32 weeks, compared with fetal values in those with postnatal TcSO 2 ≥ 65%. Conclusions Compared with normal fetuses, those with TGA‐IVS undergo a complex redistribution of blood flow during the second half of pregnancy, with higher global pulmonary flow, lower ductal flow (with negative diastolic flow at the end of pregnancy) and a smaller foramen ovale. In addition, fetal cardiac hemodynamic anomalies observed at 28–32 weeks' gestation were associated with lower postnatal TcSO 2 . These observations may provide a better understanding of premature closure of the foramen ovale and postnatal hypoxia that are specific to TGA‐IVS physiology. © 2019 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207