MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Metal Earth: Role of multidisciplinary geophysical methods to improve knowledge of mineral deposition across Precambrian rocks

2019· article· en· W2983618607 on OpenAlex
Esmaeil Eshaghi, Richard S. Smith, Mostafa Naghizadeh, Graham J. Hill, Eric Roots, Amir Maleki Ghahfarokhi, Saeid Cheraghi, J. A. Ayer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMagnetotelluricsArcheanPetrophysicsGeophysicsPrecambrianGreenstone beltTransectMineral resource classificationGeochemistryTerraneMineral explorationPetrologySeismologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SummaryRecently, there was an increase of costs to explore new economical mineral occurrences, while the success of discovery of new deposits has diminished. Therefore, Metal Earth was conceived with the objective to improve understanding of the processes controlling the distribution of mineral endowment, with a focus on Archean greenstone belts of the Canadian Superior Province as a global representative of these belts. Part of Metal Earth is to study thirteen different transects with a total length of >1000 km associated with Archean greenstone belts with various degrees of mineralisation (from less endowed to well-endowed) using high-resolution multidisciplinary geological and geophysical data. The goal is to reliably identify deeper underlying crustal/mantle conditions controlling mineralisation and also to validate existing ore deposit models by better identifying components contributing to mineral endowment.In this paper, we discuss acquiring, processing and preliminary modelling of multidisciplinary geophysical data (i.e. seismic, magnetotelluric, potential field data and petrophysical characterisations) to reliably model subsurface features along the transects. Across the Swayze transect, seismic sections clearly show sub-horizontal and dipping geological boundaries and magnetotelluric model reveals pathways as narrow upper crustal sub-vertical zones of low resistivity. In addition, joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data on initial models constrained by surface geology, seismic and magnetotelluric models and petrophysical characterisations have improved the models by better detecting at depth the limits of lithological units, low-density batholiths, dykes and fault zones.New models reveal there are significant crustal difference between the well-endowed Abitibi and the less prospective Wabigoon subprovinces. The final models will map the lithospheric architecture and constrain large-scale intracratonic controls on magmatism, crustal and tectonic evolution, and subsequently mineralisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it