El yo transontologico: la respuesta de nishitani keiji a la subjetividad cartesiana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La presente tesis se propone analizar la relevancia de la crítica de Nishitani Keiji (1900-1990) a la concepción de res cogitans defendida por René Descartes (1596-1650). Aunque en la historia de la filosofía diversos pensadores hayan expuesto, desde distintos puntos de vista, los problemas relativos al modelo de subjetividad cartesiana, se pretende demostrar en qué medida la propuesta racionalista moderna todavía es un problema por superar. Para ello es imperativo comprobar hasta qué punto el análisis crítico de Nishitani del concepto cartesiano es acertado. Además, sostenemos que la propuesta existencial y religiosa nishitaniana de superación de la perspectiva de subjetividad moderna significa una crítica a la noción de sustancia. De modo que se pretende comprobar que el problema de la subjetividad en Nishitani no es abordado como una discusión meramente epistemológica, sino que la realización del yo auténtico es una cuestión ontológica, que desafía las bases de la filosofía europea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".