One-Side Cutting Strategy for Ultraprecise Single Point Cutting of V-grooves Case 1: Constant Chip Thickness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
V-groove microstructures have found a variety of applications across different fields. Presently, they are widely utilized for different surface functionalization purposes ranging from optical to non-optical. So far, single point cutting constitutes the main technology used to fabricate this particular type of surface microstructures. However, the surveyed literature revealed a paucity of in-depth studies focused on V-groove fabrication process. To address this, a one-side cutting strategy will be presented in this study, its primary goal being to generate intended microstructures with constant chip thickness. The analytical approach developed in context has resulted in a multi-pass path planning strategy. To complement that, the cutting forces generated during the process were experimentally measured alongside with the surface quality on V-groove facets. The results obtained have validated the expected linear dependency between the chips removed and the cutting force amplitude. In addition to this dependency, the tested one-side cutting strategy proved to be capable of producing ultraprecise surfaces characterized by an areal surface roughness under 10 nm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".