MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2983787189 · doi:10.3168/jds.2019-17220

Short communication: Risk factors identified at arrival associated with average daily gain at a grain-fed veal facility: A prospective single cohort study

2019· article· en· W2983787189 on OpenAlexaff
Karen A. Scott, D.F. Kelton, T.F. Duffield, D.L. Renaud

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal health and immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProspective cohort studyCohortAnimal scienceMedicineEnvironmental healthDemographyBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary objective of this prospective cohort study was to identify factors evaluated upon arrival at a grain-fed veal facility that were associated with increased growth. A secondary objective was to determine if the factors associated with average daily gain (ADG) varied between the pre- and postweaning periods. Calves were visually assessed and scored using a standardized health scoring system immediately upon arrival. They were also weighed and vaccinated, and had blood drawn from their jugular vein to determine their serum total protein level. Weights were taken on d 49 and 78 after arrival and were used to calculate ADG. Three mixed linear regression models were created to determine factors associated with ADG from 0 to 49 d after arrival, 0 to 78 d after arrival, and 49 to 78 d after arrival. A total of 998 calves were evaluated and weighed upon arrival; 636 and 915 of those calves were weighed at d 49 and d 78, respectively. Mean ADG were 610 g/d from 0 to 49 d after arrival, 860 g/d from 0 to 78 d after arrival, and 1,240 g/d from 49 to 78 d after arrival. In the model evaluating growth from 0 to 49 d, calves arriving at the facility with a higher body mass index (BMI) gained more weight per day than calves that arrived with a lower BMI. If calves arrived in the spring, they gained 201 g/d more than calves that arrived in the winter. For the period following weaning (d 49 to 78), BMI was also associated with growth. For every additional 1 g/cm 2 increase in BMI at arrival, calves gained an additional 1.55 g/d from d 49 to 78. Growth from arrival to d 78 was affected solely by BMI. For every 1 g/cm 2 increase in BMI at arrival, calves gained 1.23 g/d more during the entire observation period. Body mass index and season at arrival affected growth through the initial period at a grain-fed veal facility. Producers should consider these factors, especially BMI, when purchasing calves to maximize the calves' growth potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicAnimal health and immunologyFrench-language works237,207