Correlates of spiritual wellbeing in persons living with Parkinson disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spirituality influences chronic disease coping skills through both positive and negative means. Although previous research notes similar associations between faith and Parkinson disease (PD) management, little is known about spirituality in the context of PD management in a palliative setting. The purpose of this paper is to gain a better understanding of the association between spirituality and PD management to best maximize the effect of spiritual counseling in treatment of the disease. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline data of a larger randomized, controlled trial. Individuals with PD and their caregivers were recruited from three study sites with currently-operating outpatient movement disorders and palliative care programs. Correlations were conducted between FACIT total scores and subscales with hypothesized associative factors, such as quality of life (QOL), mood and cognition, advance care planning, and physical symptoms. RESULTS: Two-hundred and ten PD patients and 175 caregivers participated in the study. FACIT scores correlated positively with older age, existence of a caregiver, and involvement in support groups. Higher spirituality was associated with less impairment in QOL, lower anxiety, lower depression, fewer non-motor symptoms, reduced palliative symptoms, and less prolonged grief. There was no significant association between patient FACIT scores and the MDS UPDRS or MoCA scores. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the influences of spirituality in PD management and further support the holistic, interdisciplinary care provided to PD patients through palliative care teams offering chaplaincy support to patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".