MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984054658 · doi:10.1109/ted.2019.2947565

Suppression of Capillary Flow in Slot-Die Coating for the Fabrication of Fine OLED Stripe

2019· article· en· W2984054658 on OpenAlexaff
Jinyoung Lee, Xun Li, Jongwoon Park

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanomaterials and Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsFabricationDie (integrated circuit)OLEDCapillary actionMaterials scienceCoatingOptoelectronicsFlow (mathematics)Layer (electronics)PhysicsComposite materialNanotechnologyMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to lateral and vertical capillary flows appearing in a slot-die head with μ-tip for fine line coating, line breakup occurs at a relatively low coating speed, making it difficult to narrow the stripe. Through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, we demonstrate that capillary flow can be substantially suppressed by increasing the contact angle of the head lip and forming the microscale groove patterns in the dual plate (shim and meniscus guide). It is shown that the corresponding contact angle of the groove patterns increases up to 120°. Based on the simulation results, we have coated the head lip with a hydrophobic material and embedded the dual plate with micropatterns fabricated by a laser cutter into the slot-die head. Using such a hydrophobic slot-die head, we can suppress the lateral capillary flow of an aqueous poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly (4-styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) to a great extent and, hence, increase the coating speed, rendering the stripe narrow (≈76 μm). To demonstrate its applicability to organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), we have also fabricated fine red, green, and blue OLED stripes and successfully achieved light emission from them with the emission area of 80 μm × 5 cm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Electron DevicesSame topicNanomaterials and Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207