MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984193881 · doi:10.5539/jas.v11n18p105

Climatic and Anthropic Influence on the Geodiversity of the Maranhão Amazon Floodplain

2019· article· en· W2984193881 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGeography and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexGeodiversityDeforestation (computer science)Amazon rainforestWetlandGeographyBiodiversityVegetation (pathology)Environmental sciencePhysical geographyFloodplainAgricultureRamsar siteForestryClimate changeEcologyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Maranhense Amazon floodplain shelters a Ramsar site established by the United Nations for the protection of wetland biodiversity. Despite its protected ecological status, the impacts from deforestation, burning, the agricultural and livestock industries, are on the rise. Knowledge of the spatial distribution and temporal dynamics of these impacts are important to improve the understanding of how this region is affected. Data on increasing deforestation and hot pixels were used to evaluate the anthropogenic pressure under the geodiversity of the region, relating them to the environmental variables (rainfall, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and Deforestation annual deforestation rate) measured through the rainfall data and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). In this study, the potential of remote sensing and geographic information system. The time series were used from 2001 to 2016 for all variables. We observed a strong negative and significant correlation between hot pixels and NDVI, while hot pixels increase, the vegetation indexes tend to decrease. In 2006 an abrupt fall in the NDVI occurred due to the marked increase in the deforested area. In 2010, the NDVI reached its highest levels, because the vegetation responded to the highest rainfall observed in the period in 2009. Unit 4 presented the highest pixels number in the period evaluated (2,978 pixels; 55% of the total). There is a significant correlation between NDVI and rainfall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it