Old Data, Changed Times, New Resource? A Case Study, Barrytown, New Zealand, Ilmenite Garnet Gold Zircon
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SummaryThe project geology has been compiled reviewed and a new, modern, resource database has been developed for the Barrytown New Zealand, Ilmenite Garnet Gold Zircon project.The work required existing databases to be updated to include all historic mineral sands and gold data, and consolidated and checked versus original records.The NZ Petroleum and Minerals (NZPAM) Mineral Report (MR) documents for the Barrytown project were checked and the data was compared to that contained in the project databases compiled prior to this recent 2018 work. Additional information was extracted and added into the databases including omitted holes, collars, size fractions, magnetic fractions, lithology, and especially gold assays. Within the project budget, as much additional data as could possibly be extracted was found by being persistent and systematically working through the contained information. The NZPAM system, although not ideal, does contain a wealth of information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it