Elevated fasting vs post‐load glucose levels and pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes: a population‐based study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: To examine the relative association between fasting plasma glucose vs post-load (1-h and 2-h) glucose levels based on the oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy and large-for-gestational-age and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: All live singleton births between October 2008 and December 2014 in Alberta, Canada were included. Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed using Diabetes Canada criteria. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between fasting plasma glucose vs post-load values and large-for-gestational-age infants and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy after adjusting for maternal characteristics and pharmaceutical intervention in gestational diabetes pregnancies. RESULTS: Among 257 547 pregnancies, 208 344 (80.9%) had negative 50-g glucose challenge tests, 36 261 (14.1%) had negative 75-g oral glucose tolerance tests, and 12 942 (5.0%) had gestational diabetes based on either elevated fasting plasma glucose (n=4130, 1.6%) or elevated 1-h and/or 2-h oral glucose tolerance test values (n=8812, 3.4%). Large-for-gestational-age and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy rates were 8.1% and 5.1% in negative glucose challenge test pregnancies, 11.0% and 7.0% in negative oral glucose tolerance test pregnancies, 22.4% and 11.9% in gestational diabetes pregnancies with elevated fasting plasma glucose, and 9.1% and 8% in gestational diabetes pregnancies with elevated post-load levels, respectively. Among gestational diabetes pregnancies, those with elevated fasting plasma glucose were at higher risk of large-for-gestational age (adjusted odds ratio 2.66, 95% CI 2.39-2.96) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.33-1.72) outcomes relative to pregnancies with post-load glucose elevations only. Fasting plasma glucose remained significantly associated with adverse outcomes in gestational diabetes pregnancies with and without pharmacological intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated fasting plasma glucose in women with gestational diabetes is a stronger predictor of large-for-gestational-age and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy outcomes than elevated post-load glucose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".