MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984355925 · doi:10.3390/diagnostics9040195

Neonatal Mass Urine Screening Approach for Early Detection of Mucopolysaccharidoses by UPLC-MS/MS

2019· article· en· W2984355925 on OpenAlexaff
Iskren Menkovic, Anne-Sophie Marchand, Michel Boutin, Christiane Auray‐Blais

Bibliographic record

VenueDiagnostics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrineChromatographyNewborn screeningChemistryMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs) are lysosomal storage disorders caused by deficiencies of enzymes involved in the catabolism of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Various treatments such as enzyme replacement therapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplant are available for MPSs. Early initiation of treatment improves the outcome and delays the onset of symptoms, highlighting the need for newborn screening for MPSs. The main objective of this project was to devise and validate a multiplex urine filter paper method for GAG analysis using a tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) approach to screen newborns for MPSs. Eluted urine samples from 21-day-old newborns were evaporated and a methanolysis reaction was performed. Samples were resuspended and analyzed using a UPLC-MS/MS system. A one-minute chromatographic method allowed the absolute quantification of heparan sulfate (HS), dermatan sulfate (DS), and creatinine. Method validation revealed high precision (< 9% relative standard deviation) and accuracy (< 7% bias) for all analytes. The reference values normalized to creatinine obtained by the analysis of five hundred 21-day-old newborn urine samples were 34.6 +/-6.2 mg/mmol of creatinine and 17.3 +/-3.9 mg/mmol of creatinine for HS and DS, respectively. We present a rapid and efficient method for populational newborn urine screening using MS/MS, which could also be applied to high-risk screening.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiagnosticsSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207