MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984386797 · doi:10.33137/cpoj.v2i1.33061

ULTRASOUND-GUIDED CONTINUOUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION OF PAINFUL RESIDUAL LIMB NEUROMA IN INDIVIDUALS WITH LIMB AMPUTATION- A RETROSPECTIVE CASE SERIES

2019· article· en· W2984386797 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Shigong Guo, Ramy Mansour, David Slater

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeuromaAmputationSurgeryAnalgesicAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Residual limb neuromas are a significant cause of post-amputation pain. There is little knowledge concerning ultrasound-guided (US) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as treatment. OBJECTIVE: To investigate US-guided RFA for neuroma associated pain in individuals with limb amputation. METHODOLOGY: The notes of nine consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed. Information obtained included neuroma size and nerve, RFA duration/temperature, pain scores, analgesic requirements and ease/comfort of prosthetic use. Eight patients had lower-limb amputations and one had a trans-radial amputation. All except one, underwent diagnostic US-guided steroid injection to confirm the neuroma as the source of pain, prior to RFA. RESULTS: Six patients reported significant reduction in pain scores (defined as at least 50% reduction) and an improvement in comfort/ease of wearing their prosthetic limb, with no adverse effects. Three of these six patients also reported a reduction in analgesic requirements. Of the three remaining patients – one had a large sciatic nerve neuroma that was eventually surgically excised, another had confounding pain from an adjacent bony spur, whilst the third patient did not receive a routine diagnostic steroid injection prior to RFA. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that US-guided RFA is safe and effective for small to medium-sized residual limb neuroma associated pain in individuals with limb amputation. It can reduce pain and analgesic requirements, improve comfort/ease of wearing the prosthesis and potentially avoid surgical excision. We recommend patients should undergo a diagnostic steroid injection prior to RFA to confirm that the neuroma is the source of pain. LAYMAN’S ABSTRACTAfter amputation, many patients can get a neuroma which can cause significant pain leading to discomfort wearing the prosthetic limb. Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation can successfully treat painful residual limb neuromas in individuals with limb amputation which in turn can reduce the patient’s pain medications and improve the comfort of wearing the prosthetic limb. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/33061/25509 How to Cite: Guo S, Mansour R, Henderson Slater D. Ultrasound-guided continuous radiofrequency ablation of painful residual limb neuroma in individuals with limb amputation- A retrospective case series. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2019; volume2, Issue1, No.4. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v2i1.33061 CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:Shigong Guo,LLM MSc(Orth Eng) MRCS, Specialty Registrar in Rehabilitation MedicineOxford Centre for Enablement, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK.Email: shigong@doctors.org.uk

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics JournalSame topicPain Management and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207