MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characterization of the Role of Shroom3 in Nephron Formation

2019· article· en· W2984391952 on OpenAlexafffund
Patricia Kitala, Joanna Cunanan, Darren Bridgewater

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKidney Foundation of Canada
KeywordsNephronMesenchymeCell biologyKidney developmentBiologyKidneyUreteric budEmbryonic stem cellMorphogenesisCell typeMesenchymal stem cellCellInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During kidney development the proper formation of the nephron, the functional unit of the kidney, is essential for normal kidney function. Nephrogenesis is the process in which nephron progenitors undergo cell shape changes and mesenchymal‐to‐epithelial transition to form mature nephrons. These cell shape changes are essential for the proper development of the nephron and for proper nephron function. Shroom3 is an actin‐binding protein that regulates epithelial cell shape. It regulates this morphogenesis by binding to F actin and interacting with Rho‐kinase. This leads to the phosphorylation of non‐muscle myosin II activating a signal pathway that causes contraction of the actomysoin network. This contraction causes the cell to form “pie” shaped cells, a process that is essential for tubule formation. Kidneys from shroom3 null mice have numerous abnormal nephrons with collapsing glomeruli at embryonic day E18.5, supporting a role for shroom3 in nephron formation. We hypothesize that Shroom3 is required for mesenchyme cells to cluster and form cell aggregates, pretubular aggregates, and renal vesicles. To support a role for Shroom3 in nephrogenesis we first localized Shroom3 expression. Shroom3 was highly expressed in the aggregating mesenchyme, renal vesicle, and parietal and visceral epithelial cells of the developing glomeruli. In contrast to wild‐type Shroom3 mice, E13.5 kidney histology of Shroom3 mutants demonstrated an increased distance of mesenchymal cells from the neighbouring ureteric bud tip cells (WT 3.85μm ± 0.30, MUT 14.80 μm ±1.22, n=9). These abnormalities were further observed by immunofluorescence (IF) using Six2 and Pax2, specific markers of the mesenchyme aggregates. In E13.5, the IF demonstrated an increased length in the cap mesenchyme (WT 179.6μm ± 24.96, MUT 306.4μm ± 33.30, n=9), and a lack of cap mesenchyme cell aggregation in Shroom3 mutants (WT 8804μm 2 ±1250, MUT 12353 μm 2 ±1504, n=9). In addition, E18.5 mutants displayed significantly less Six2+ cells in comparison to wild‐types (WT 149 ± 13.3, MUT 79.5 ± 7.47). The analysis for renal vesicles in Shroom3 mutants at E13.5 and E18.5 demonstrated abnormally forming renal vesicles that were few in number when compared to wild‐type (WT 3 ±0.58, MUT 1 ± 0, n=9). Taken together, our findings establish, for the first time, that Shroom3 is essential for the early stages of nephron formation, and suggest these early changes lead to improper migration and clustering of cap mesenchyme cells resulting in abnormal nephrons observed in null mice. Support or Funding Information CIHR, NSERC, KFOC This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207