MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984429929 · doi:10.1111/awr.12173

New Maritimity and Heritagization in Catalonia’s Small‐Scale Fisheries

2019· article· en· W2984429929 on OpenAlexaff
Sabrina Doyon, Eliseu Carbonell i Camós

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropology of Work Review · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRural development and sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFishingRuralityContext (archaeology)Post-industrial societyScale (ratio)TourismFisheryGeographyWork (physics)BusinessFish <Actinopterygii>Environmental planningEnvironmental resource managementEconomic geographyPolitical scienceEconomyEconomicsEngineeringRural areaCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Catalonia is undergoing a process of maritime heritagization embedded in the coast’s postindustrial context and the growing intensification of tourism over the past 50 years, providing some small‐scale fishermen with opportunities to adapt to the current fishery crisis. These initiatives are transforming conventional fishing patterns and may take different shapes: services for tourists who want to go out on the water for a day of “real fishing” on boat tours, the use and restoration of centuries‐old ships, and local seafood catering services providing meals on land and at sea. This paper explores these initiatives in light of new mobility studies, aiming to analyze the changes that are occurring in the work of small‐scale fisheries, to situate them in a wider structural context, and to understand the extent of these recent transformations and how they are tied to heritagization mechanisms. We wish to shed light on whether these changes are related to a decrease in small‐scale fishing activity and a related loss in local environmental knowledge, or a form of renewal of local fishing practices and of “being in the coastal world.” Could it be the dawn of a “new maritimity,” a part of the rising “new rurality”?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropology of Work ReviewSame topicRural development and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207