MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984704995 · doi:10.1093/chromsci/bmz069

A Sensitive and Quantitative Isotope-Dilution LC-MS/MS Method for Analysis of Hydrazine in Tobacco Smoke

2019· article· en· W2984704995 on OpenAlex
Mehran Sharifi, Carmen Donisa, Peter Joza

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chromatographic Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryChromatographyIsotope dilutionDilutionTobacco smokeQuantitative analysis (chemistry)Hydrazine (antidepressant)Mass spectrometryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new isotope dilution liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric method was developed for the analysis of potential hydrazine present in tobacco smoke. The sample preparation was performed via an optimized derivatization method using an aqueous buffer:methanol solution of 2-nitrobenzaldehyde (10 g/L) used as a derivatizing agent. The mainstream smoke of cigarettes was passed through a glass fiber filter pad followed by a trapping solution containing an isotopically labeled 15N2-hydrazine used as internal standard. After smoking, the filter pad was extracted with the trapping solution and then incubated for 30 minutes at 35°C. An aliquot of the extract was centrifuged and the resultant hydrazone was quantified by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The isotope dilution standard calibration curve demonstrated good linearity (R2 > 0.999) from 0.079 to 248 ng/mL, with limits of quantification in mainstream smoke of 0.2 and 0.4 ng/cig for ISO and Canadian Intense smoking regimens, respectively. The method recovery was assessed using samples spiked with solutions of known amounts of hydrazine. The results showed good accuracy with recoveries ranging from 98 to 111%. Although there were no detectable levels of hydrazine in the reference cigarettes used in the validation (KR3R4F), the method precision was estimated to be ~10% based on the variability observed in the spiked samples. Trapping efficiencies were assessed using a hydrazine permeation tube providing a known amount of hydrazine vapor such that the distribution between the vapor phase and particulate phase of mainstream smoke could be determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it