Factors Contributing to Delayed Health Seeking Behaviours Among Adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most adolescents for various reasons fail to go and seek for health care regarding health risks and challenges until they are faced with the complications. The socio-cultural belief concerning the causes of illnesses and its characteristic has correlation with the treatment seeking behaviour of an individual. OBJECTIVES: The study explored and described factors contributing to delayed health-seeking behaviours amongst adolescents in Kutlwanong clinic, North West Province. METHOD: This was a qualitative study designed using a phenomenological approach. Individual semi-structured in-depth interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. 8 Steps of Tesch’s inductive, descriptive open coding technique by Creswell was used followed by independent coding. Purposive sampling recruited fourteen participants aged 15–18 years. Trustworthiness criteria adhered to were credibility, dependability, transferability, and confirmability. Ethical clearance was sought with the University of Limpopo. RESULTS: Factors that negatively impact adolescents’ health-seeking behavior include the negative attitude of nurses and community, influenced by peers, shortage of medicine, lack of services throughout weekends, long queues, waiting times, distance, and lack of knowledge. Family planning and antenatal care were the common reason for seeking health care. CONCLUSION: Being aware of factors contributing to delay health-seeking behaviours will facilitate with setting future priorities to guard the health, well-being, and dignity of adolescents. The impacts of youth programs must be monitored on a regular basis to assess the needs and capabilities of specific facilities. Clinic manager to ensure compliance with the national core standards to meet adolescent’s immediate expectations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".