Relevance of an Existing Knowledge-to-Action Model to Research involving Urban Indigenous Youth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our research examined the potential of the Graham et al. (2006) knowledge-to-action (KTA) model in guiding knowledge translation in the context of urban indigenous youth and sport/physical activity. Community nights were held in Kamloops, BC, and Winnipeg, MB to disseminate results from conversations examining the sport/physical activity experiences of youth in these two locations. We analyzed our knowledge translation approach relative to the KTA model. We elucidated five recommendations: (a) clarification that the knowledge creation and action cycles are interwoven, (b) include a rapport-building phase, (c) customizing the research process to participants and research assistants, (d) ensuring participation is consistent, regular, and will not conflict with other commitments participants have, and (e) dedicating a phase to identifying, locating, and recruiting resources needed to conduct projects in ways directed by participants. These five considerations will help make the KTA model more culturally relevant to urban indigenous youth.Keywords:Urban Indigenous youth; physical activity; knowledge-to-action; knowledge translation. Resume Notre recherche examine le potentiel du modele de « knowledge-to-action - KTA» de Graham et al. (2006) (« du savoir a l’action ») pour orienter une traduction / adaptation du savoir dans le contexte de la pratique sportive et d’activite physique de jeunes autochtones en milieu urbain. Des soirees ont ete tenues dans des communautes a Kamloops Colombie Britannique et a Winnipeg au Manitoba pour disseminer les resultats de conversations sur le theme des experiences sportives et d’activites physique de jeunes de ces villes. Nous avons analyse notre approche de traduction / adaptation du savoir en relation avec le modele KTA. A partir de cette analyse, nous mettons de l’avant cinq recommandations : (a) l’integration des cycles creation de savoir-action doit etre clarifiee; (b) l’importance d’etablir une relation avec les participants; (c) l’adaptation de la presentation du processus de recherche aux participants et aux assistants de recherche; (d) la sollicitation d’une participation reguliere, pertinente qui considere les autres engagements des participants; (e) la mise en en place d’une phase d’identification-reperage- recuperation des ressources necessaires pour des projets orientes par les participants. Le respect de ces recommandations aidera a rendre le modele KTA plus pertinent compte tenu de la culture des jeunes autochtones du milieu urbain. Mots-cles :jeunes autochtones de milieu urbain; sport / activite physique; du savoir a l’action; traduction / adaptation du savoir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".