MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2984855035 · doi:10.18280/isi.240413

Design of a Reliable Current Starved Inverter Based Arbiter Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) for Hardware Cryptography

2019· article· en· W2984855035 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anil Kumar Kurra, Usha Rani Nelakuditi

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArbiterCryptographyPhysical unclonable functionInverterComputer scienceComputer hardwareHardware security moduleEmbedded systemEngineeringElectrical engineeringComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For most cryptographic algorithms, the secret keys must be permanently stored in nonvolatile memories (NVNs) and used for distinct security operations.This gives rise to power constraints, location limits and security threats to hardware facilities.To solve the problems, this paper proposes a novel and reliable current starved inverter (CSI) based on a physical unclonable function (PUF) architecture (8, 16 and 32 stages), using 45nm complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology.The proposed CSI was simulated on Spectre Simulation Platform.The results show that its uniqueness, reliability and randomness were 49.26 %, 98.86 % and 86.12 %, respectively, in the temperature range of -20~80 ℃.In addition, the performance of the proposed CSI was proved to outshine that of existing PUF architectures in stability and reliability.The research results are significant for the development of critical security applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityFrench-language works237,207