Power coefficient measurements of a novel vertical axis wind turbine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Wind tunnel experiments were performed to evaluate the power coefficients of three vertical axis wind turbines ( VAWT s), namely, (a) conventional VAWT (two‐bladed troposkien shape), (b) novel 50% shifted troposkien shape‐vertical axis wind turbine (50% STS ‐ VAWT ), and (c) novel 100% STS ‐ VAWT . All turbines had the same height, swept area, and NACA 0015 airfoil with the same chord length. During the power coefficient measurements for each one of the turbines, the wind tunnel velocity was varied while the turbine rotation was kept constant through rheostatic load adjustment. Two different turbine rotations were used (600 rpm and 700 rpm). The resulting tip speed ratios ( TSR s) ranged from approximately 2 to 6 in the current investigation. Both the power coefficients and the tip speed ratios were corrected against wind tunnel blockage effects. The 50% STS ‐ VAWT model showed an overall better aerodynamic performance (both corrected and uncorrected power coefficients) when compared against the other two configurations, likely due to a combination of (a) power generation increased due to blade‐wake interaction ( BWI ) reductions and (b) power generation capacity related to the blade length of each turbine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".