MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985001761 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.666

Career satisfaction of Polish physicians – evidence from a survey study

2019· article· en· W2985001761 on OpenAlexaff
Alicja Domagała, Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez, Katarzyna Dubas‐Jakóbczyk

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJob satisfactionPatient satisfactionFamily medicineMedicinePsychologyNursingSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Understanding physician satisfaction and the factors associated are relevant for physicians, their patients and decision makers. We conducted the first national-wide study evaluating the satisfaction of Polish doctors using a multidimensional approach. The aims of this study were to: 1) measure the career satisfaction of physicians working in Polish hospitals, and 2) identify the factors associated with higher levels of career satisfaction. Methods A quantitative, on-line survey among 15 nation-wide distributed Polish hospitals (7 general, 5 specialists, and 3 university) was conducted between March and June 2018. A 17-item questionnaire was used to measure satisfaction on a scales from 1.00 to 6.00, as well as their personal, professional, performance, and inherent satisfaction levels. In total, 1.003 questionnaires were included in the study (response rate=38%). Unconditional associations and multivariable regressions models were used to evaluate associations between satisfaction levels and their demographic and work-related factors. Results The mean level of physician satisfaction was 4.10 (SD = 0.69). Almost 57% of the doctors reported being from “somewhat satisfied” to “very satisfied” with their careers; although, only 8.2% reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their career (≥5.00). Doctors reported high levels of inherent satisfaction (mean=4.4, SD = 0.66) and low levels of personal satisfaction (mean=3.78, SD = 0.98). Age and work experience were positively and significantly associated with satisfaction. Conclusions The satisfaction of Polish physicians is moderate. Doctors reported higher levels of satisfaction with their interactions with direct supervisor, other physicians, nurses, doctor-patient relationships and the lowest satisfaction with the salary and work-life balance. Gender, numbers of working hours/week; years of work experience and the stage of professional development were the factors associated with higher satisfaction. Key messages The satisfaction of physicians working in Polish hospitals is moderate. The current shortage of Polish physicians makes their satisfaction especially significant for motivation and retention. Physician satisfaction is an important indicator for managers. Attention regarding levels and factors affecting doctors’ satisfaction should be one of the key issues of health workforce management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.263
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutFrench-language works237,207