MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985121320 · doi:10.1021/om9910221

Density Functional Study of the Migratory Insertion Step in the Carbonylation of Methanol Catalyzed by [M(CO)<sub>2</sub>I<sub>2</sub>]<sup>-</sup>(M = Rh, Ir)

2000· article· en· W2985121320 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryCarbonylationDensity functional theoryLigand (biochemistry)EnthalpyMethanolCatalysisIodideAb initioMigratory insertionEthyl iodidePhysical chemistryCrystallographyMedicinal chemistryComputational chemistryCarbon monoxideInorganic chemistryThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum-mechanical calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) have been carried out on the migratory insertion process [M(CO) 2 I 3 (CH 3 )] - → [M(CO)I 3 (COCH 3 )] - (M = Rh, Ir), which represents an important step in methanol carbonylation. The calculated free energies of activation (Δ G ⧧ ) are 27.7 kcal mol - 1 (Ir) and 17.2 kcal mol - 1 (Rh), in good agreement with the experimental estimates at 30.6 ± 1.0 kcal mol - 1 (Ir) and 19.3 ± 0.5 kcal mol - 1 (Rh). The higher barrier for M = Ir is attributed to a relativistic stabilization of the Ir−CH 3 bond. It is indicated that enthalpic and entropic contributions to Δ G ⧧ can vary considerably, depending on reaction conditions, without changing Δ G ⧧ considerably. Especially, simulations based on ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) underlined that the reaction system might prefer to trade entropy for enthalpy in polar solutions by dissociating an I - ligand for M = Ir. A systematic study was also carried out on the general methyl migration reaction [Ir(CO) 2 I 2 L(CH 3 )] n - → [Ir(CO)I 2 L(COCH 3 )] n - ( n = 0, 1), in which an iodide ligand trans to methyl is replaced by another ligand L (where L = CH 3 OH, CH 3 C(O)OH, CO, P(OCH 3 ) 3, SnI 3 - ) or an empty coordination site. The free energy of activation for the methyl migration in [Ir(CO) 2 I 2 L(CH 3 )] with L trans to methyl follows the order P(OCH 3 ) 3 > CO > SnI 3 -, none > I - > CH 3 OH, CH 3 C(O)OH with respect to the ligand L. This order is to a first approximation determined by the ability of L to labilize the M−CH 3 bond trans to it. The order is further shaped by the ability of the π-acceptors L = CO, P(OCH 3 ) 3 to stabilize the transition state, and, in the case of L = none, by the relocation of an iodide ligand to the site trans to the migrating methyl group. It is finally discussed how placing L cis to the migrating CH 3 group might influence the migratory aptitude of methyl.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it