MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2985386174 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noz175.1101

TMOD-02. A MODEL OF THE INITIATION AND GENOMIC LANDSCAPE OF GLIOBLASTOMA (GBM)

2019· article· en· W2985386174 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra Böhm, Jessica DePetro, Carmen Binding, Cameron J. Grisdale, Matthaeus Ware, Sam Lawn, Nick Chahley, Shazreh Bukhari, Cindy Chen, Amanda Gerber, Kaitlin Thomas, Haley Pedersen, Hiba Omairi, Michael Blough, J. Gregory Cairncross

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of Calgary
FundersNarodowe Centrum Badań i RozwojuInstytut Biologii Doswiadczalnej im. M. Nenckiego PAN
KeywordsSubventricular zoneBiologyComparative genomic hybridizationCancer researchGeneNeural stem cellStem cellCell biologyGeneticsGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract IDH-wildtype GBM is the most common variant of this cancer and occurs in older adults. Unfortunately patients’ tumors are either inherently resistant to standard treatment, which includes radio- and chemo-therapy, or acquire resistance during the therapeutic process. Additionally, although effective in other cancers, targeted therapies have yielded disappointing results in GBM, perhaps because the fully developed disease has significant cellular and molecular heterogeneity, allowing the tumour to adapt to treatments. Better insight into managing GBM might result from a detailed knowledge of its initiating events, which have not yet been elucidated. With this in mind, we developed a mouse model of GBM in which the earliest stages can be studied. This ex vivo model recreates GBM by culturing subventricular zone (SVZ) cells, the putative ‘cell of origin’ of GBM in platelet-derived growth factor A (PDGFA). Under this condition SVZ cells from p53 null mice transform, becoming exogenous growth factor independent and tumorigenic in immune-competent mice. In contrast, wildtype SVZ cells do not proliferate in PDGFA and null cells in EGF/FGF do not transform. To discover why p53 null SVZ cells uniquely transform in PDGFA, we performed array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on cells before and after transformation in PDGFA and whole genome sequencing (WGS) on transformed cells and tumours generated from PDGFA-transformed cells. aCGH and WGS revealed that the genomic landscape of transformed cells displayed a striking similarity to that observed in primary human GBM. Specifically, these studies showed that chromosomal alterations are a hallmark of culturing SVZ cells in PDGFA, an intriguing finding considering GBM is also characterized by a specific landscape of copy number alterations. This model may resemble the pathogenesis of human GBM and be leveraged to investigate the early stages of tumorigenesis, further leading to the development of preventative strategies and novel therapeutics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→