MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2985466397 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031595

The association between depression and later educational attainment in children and adolescents: a systematic review protocol

2019· review· en· W2985466397 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alice Wickersham, Sophie Epstein, Holly Victoria Rose Sugg, Robert Stewart, Tamsin Ford, Johnny Downs

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchDepartment of Health and Social CareKing's College LondonPsychiatry Research TrustMQ: Transforming Mental HealthUniversity of ExeterSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
KeywordsPsycINFOMedicineEducational attainmentMEDLINEPublication biasDepression (economics)Meta-analysisAssociation (psychology)Data extractionScale (ratio)Public healthClinical psychologyPsychologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Depression represents a major public health concern for children and adolescents, and is thought to negatively impact subsequent educational attainment. However, the extent to which depression and educational attainment are directly associated, and whether other factors play a role, is uncertain. Therefore, we aim to systematically review the literature to provide an up-to-date estimate on the strength of this association, and to summarise potential mediators and moderators on the pathway between the two. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To identify relevant studies, we will systematically search Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, Education Resources Information Centre and British Education Index, manually search reference lists and contact experts in the field. Studies will be included if they investigate and report on the association between major depression diagnosis or depressive symptoms in children and adolescents aged 4-18 years (exposure) and later educational attainment (outcome). Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full texts according to eligibility criteria, perform data extraction and assess study quality according to a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. If sufficiently homogeneous studies are identified, summary effect estimates will be pooled in meta-analysis, with further tests for study heterogeneity, publication bias and the effects of moderators using meta-regression. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Because this review will make use of already published data, ethical approval will not be sought. The review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at practitioner-facing conferences, and a lay summary will be written for non-scientific audiences such as parents, young people and teachers. The work will inform upcoming investigations on the association between child and adolescent mental health and educational attainment. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019123068.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.089
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.083
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0890.083
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0240.017
Bibliometrics0.0180.014
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0070.005
Research integrity0.0090.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0590.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open→Same topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development→French-language works237,207→