MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985479572 · doi:10.1002/cne.24811

Afferent connections of the thalamic nucleus reuniens in the mouse

2019· article· en· W2985479572 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Niklas Scheel, Peer Wulff, J.G. de Mooij‐van Malsen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Comparative Neurology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory and Neural Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilMedical Research Council CanadaChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu KielDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsNeuroscienceHippocampal formationPrefrontal cortexBiologyThalamusAnterograde tracingNucleusCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nucleus reuniens (RE) is part of the midline thalamus and one of the major sources of thalamic inputs to the hippocampal formation and the medial prefrontal cortex. However, it not only sends strong efferents to these areas but is also heavily innervated by both brain regions. Based on its connectivity and supported by functional studies the RE has been suggested to represent a major hub in reciprocal hippocampal-prefrontal communication. Indeed, inactivation studies have demonstrated that this nucleus is particularly important for cognitive behaviors which depend on prefrontal-hippocampal communication, such as working memory or memory consolidation. However, besides its central role in mediating hippocampal-prefrontal communication, the RE is target of a multitude of other cortical and subcortical afferents, which likely modulate its function. So far, however, studies that have systematically investigated the afferents of the RE have only been performed in rats. Because of the unique role of the mouse as a genetically accessible model system for mammalian brain circuit analysis we have mapped the afferent connectivity of the mouse RE using retrograde Fluoro-Gold tracing. Comparison with similar data from rats indicated a very high level of similarity in prefrontal and hippocampal afferents but some differences in afferent connectivity with other brain regions. In particular, our results suggest interspecies differences regarding the integration of the RE in circuits of fear, aversion, and defense.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Comparative NeurologySame topicMemory and Neural MechanismsFrench-language works237,207