Afferent connections of the thalamic nucleus reuniens in the mouse
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nucleus reuniens (RE) is part of the midline thalamus and one of the major sources of thalamic inputs to the hippocampal formation and the medial prefrontal cortex. However, it not only sends strong efferents to these areas but is also heavily innervated by both brain regions. Based on its connectivity and supported by functional studies the RE has been suggested to represent a major hub in reciprocal hippocampal-prefrontal communication. Indeed, inactivation studies have demonstrated that this nucleus is particularly important for cognitive behaviors which depend on prefrontal-hippocampal communication, such as working memory or memory consolidation. However, besides its central role in mediating hippocampal-prefrontal communication, the RE is target of a multitude of other cortical and subcortical afferents, which likely modulate its function. So far, however, studies that have systematically investigated the afferents of the RE have only been performed in rats. Because of the unique role of the mouse as a genetically accessible model system for mammalian brain circuit analysis we have mapped the afferent connectivity of the mouse RE using retrograde Fluoro-Gold tracing. Comparison with similar data from rats indicated a very high level of similarity in prefrontal and hippocampal afferents but some differences in afferent connectivity with other brain regions. In particular, our results suggest interspecies differences regarding the integration of the RE in circuits of fear, aversion, and defense.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".