MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2985734235 · doi:10.1101/833475

Antiretroviral APOBEC3 Cytidine Deaminases Alter HIV-1 Provirus Integration Site Profiles

2019· preprint· en· W2985734235 on OpenAlexafffund
Hannah O. Ajoge, Tyler M. Renner, Kasandra Bélanger, Hinissan P. Kohio, Macon D. Coleman, Marc‐André Langlois, Stephen D. Barr

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and ImmunityUniversity of OttawaWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCytidine deaminaseBiologyProvirusSomatic hypermutationIntegraseGeneticsDNAIntegrasesGeneTranscription (linguistics)Genome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT APOBEC3 (A3) proteins are host-encoded deoxycytidine deaminases that provide an innate immune barrier to retroviral infection, notably against HIV-1. While the catalytic activity of these proteins can induce catastrophic hypermutation in proviral DNA leading to near-total restriction of infection, sublethal levels of deamination contribute to the genetic evolution of HIV-1. So far, little is known about how A3 might impact HIV-1 integrations into human chromosomal DNA. Using a deep sequencing approach, we analyzed the influence A3F and A3G on HIV-1 integration site selections. DNA editing was detected at the extremities of the long terminal repeat regions of the virus. Both catalytic active and non-catalytic A3 enzymes decreased insertions into gene coding sequences and increased integration sites into SINE elements, oncogenes and transcription-silencing non-B DNA features. Our data implicate A3 as host factors that influence HIV-1 integration site selection and promote insertions into genomic sites that are transcriptionally less active. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT Schematic depicting the influence of APOBEC3 (A3) proteins on HIV integration site targeting. Left , in the absence of A3, HIV has a strong preference for integrating into genes. Right , both catalytic active and non-catalytic A3 mutants decrease integration into genes and increase integration into SINE elements and in transcription-silencing non-B DNA features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicHIV Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→