MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985751700 · doi:10.1121/1.5131235

Geoacoustic inversion of the acoustic-pressure vertical phase gradient from a single vector sensor

2019· article· en· W2985751700 on OpenAlexaff
Junjie Shi, Stan E. Dosso, Dajun Sun, Qing‐Yu Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGeologySeabedInversion (geology)AcousticsParticle velocityNonlinear systemInverse problemGeodesyPhysicsMathematicsSeismologyMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A vector sensor can provide measurements of ocean acoustic fields in terms of the acoustic pressure and three-dimensional particle velocity, providing potentially highly-informative data for applications such as geoacoustic inversion. This paper applies nonlinear Bayesian inversion to vector sensor data to estimate seabed geoacoustic properties and uncertainties in South China Sea. Linear-frequency-modulated source transmissions, recorded as acoustic pressure and vertical particle velocity, are processed to estimate the vertical phase gradient of acoustic pressure at multiple frequencies as the inversion data. An advantage of this type of data is that it can be modeled without knowledge of the source spectrum, allowing inversion with an unknown source and a single sensor. Geoacoustic inversion of phase-gradient data is carried out and compared to inversion of the vertical acoustic impedance, another type of vector-sensor data, independent of the source spectrum, which has been considered previously. Model selection for the optimal number of seabed sediment layers is carried out using Bayesian information criterion, and parameter estimates, uncertainties, and correlations are calculated using delayed-rejection adaptive Metropolis-Hastings sampling. Results indicate a three-layer seabed model (including the semi-infinite basement), with properties in agreement with independent measurements including a high-resolution seismic profile and surficial sediment type from a core.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207