MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2985794754 · doi:10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b00512

Flavipesines A and B and Asperchalasines E–H: Cytochalasans and Merocytochalasans from <i>Aspergillus flavipes</i>

2019· article· en· W2985794754 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaotian Zhang, Lu Yang, Wenjing Wang, Zhaodi Wu, Jianping Wang, Weiguang Sun, Xiao‐Nian Li, Chunmei Chen, Hucheng Zhu, Yonghui Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Natural Products · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicrobial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hubei ProvinceHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaTongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsStereochemistryRing (chemistry)Isocitrate dehydrogenaseChemistryAspergillusBiologyEnzymeBotanyBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flavipesines A and B (1 and 2) and asperchalasines E–H (3–6), two cytochalasans with an unusual ring system and four merocytochalasans possessing a 5/6/11/5/5/6 ring system, were isolated from Aspergillus flavipes, along with three related compounds (7–9). Their structures, including absolute configurations, were determined on the basis of data from HRESIMS, NMR, ECD, molecular modeling, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Flavipesines A and B (1 and 2) represent the first examples of cytochalasans possessing a 5/6/7/6 ring system with a C-18–O–C-21 bridge. Compounds 3, 7, and 9 show moderate inhibitory activities against isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1). This is the first report on the IDH1 inhibitory activities of cytochalasans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Natural ProductsSame topicMicrobial Natural Products and BiosynthesisFrench-language works237,207