MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2986009645 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-131769

In-Hospital Mortality and Morbidity Among Patients Presenting with Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Single Center's Experience with Vitamin K Antagonists and the Direct Oral Anticoagulants

2019· article· en· W2986009645 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher Cipkar, Sujitha Srinathan, Philip Chiang, Lana A. Castellucci

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Modified Rankin ScaleSingle CenterAtrial fibrillationAdverse effectWarfarinRetrospective cohort studyMedical recordIncidence (geometry)Emergency medicinePediatricsIntensive care medicineInternal medicineIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Oral anticoagulants are the preferred therapy for the treatment of venous thromboembolism and for stroke prevention among patients with atrial fibrillation. Given their widespread use, clinicians must balance efficacy of anticoagulation with their associated bleeding risks. Specifically, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the most feared complication as this form of bleeding has the highest mortality and morbidity. To date, clinical trials suggest a lower incidence of ICH and better safety profile among patients prescribed the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with traditional vitamin k antagonists (VKAs). Although promising, further understanding is needed to appreciate the clinical impact once a DOAC-related bleeding event does occur. The aim of this study was to evaluate anticoagulation use, in-hospital mortality rates and functional outcome among patients presenting with ICH to a large tertiary care center in Canada. Methods In this study, we present data from a retrospective chart review of patients who presented to The Ottawa Hospital with ICH between January 2016 and December 2017. Patients were identified using ICD-10 codes from the Ottawa Hospital Data Warehouse. Patient demographics, type of anticoagulant/antiplatelet agent and indication for therapy were collected. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality rates among patients prescribed oral anticoagulants compared with those not anticoagulated or on antiplatelet therapy. A secondary outcome was functional assessment of survivors at hospital discharge using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), a validated tool used widely in contemporary stroke research to measure the degree of disability after a neurological event. Results 481 patients were identified in the Data Warehouse and manual chart review confirmed 429 patients diagnosed with ICH. Patients not taking any anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy tended to be younger and had lengthier admissions with longer stays in the ICU. The most common indication for anticoagulation in those presenting with ICH was atrial fibrillation. Intraparenchymal bleeding was most common among patients on DOACs, while patients on warfarin tended to have more subdural hematomas (Table 1). In-hospital mortality was 45.8% in DOAC-related ICH, 29.4% in warfarin-related ICH and 15.5% in patients not on an anticoagulant or antiplatelet. Average modified Rankin Scale at the time of discharge was 4.52 in DOAC-related ICH, 4.23 in warfarin-related ICH and 3.2 in patients not on an anticoagulant or antiplatelet (Table 2). Conclusions In this cohort of patients presenting with ICH to a large academic hospital, the in-hospital mortality rate was higher in patients receiving oral anticoagulation compared to those not on anticoagulants. DOAC-related ICH tended to have worse outcomes with higher in-hospital mortality and worse functional outcomes among survivors on discharge. Although the DOACs are reported in the literature to have an overall lower incidence of ICH, further information is still needed to understand the clinical impact when a bleeding event does occur. Disclosures Castellucci: BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Aspen: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207