MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2986030647 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-127005

Prophylactic Antibiotic Use and Risk of Meningococcal Infections in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) Treated with Eculizumab Who Received Meningococcal Vaccination: Results from the International PNH Registry

2019· article· en· W2986030647 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher J. Patriquin, Austin Kulasekararaj, Régis Peffault de Latour, Jun‐Ho Jang, Saskia Langemeijer, Alexey Maschan, Amanda Wilson, Deepak Jain, Jaroslaw P. Maciejewski

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEculizumabMedicineParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuriaVaccinationInternal medicinePediatricsNeisseria meningitidisMeningococcal vaccineImmunologyImmunizationAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) patients treated with eculizumab have an increased susceptibility to serious meningococcal infections. In the largest safety data set to date, representing >10 years of postmarketing pharmacovigilance surveillance of eculizumab for the treatment of PNH, the reported meningococcal infection rate was 0.24 per 100 patient-years (PY); cumulative exposure to eculizumab in PNH was 21,016 PY (Socié G, et al. Br J Haematol. 2019). To reduce infection risk, it is recommended that PNH patients receive meningococcal vaccination ≥2 weeks prior to the first dose of eculizumab; patients vaccinated <2 weeks prior to eculizumab initiation are treated with appropriate prophylactic antibiotics (P-Abx) until 2 weeks after vaccination. However, some patients may still experience meningococcal infections, as vaccination reduces but does not eliminate the risk of meningococcal infection; thus, some physicians use long-term P-Abx in addition to meningococcal vaccination to lower infection risk. The real-world use of P-Abx is not well characterized, and their effect on the incidence of meningococcal infection is unknown. The objective of this study was to assess meningococcal infection rates in PNH patients who received eculizumab with or without P-Abx. METHODS This was a cohort study consisting of eculizumab-treated PNH patients from the International PNH Registry (NCT01374360). Eligible patients received meningococcal vaccination within 6 months prior to or up to 1-month post-eculizumab initiation; had a known birth date, sex, enrollment date, and status of P-Abx use; and were evaluable for infection during the study period. To prospectively assess the rates of meningococcal infections, the start of the follow-up period was defined as the later of the registry enrollment date or eculizumab treatment start date and the end of the follow-up period was defined as the earlier of the last eculizumab treatment follow-up date or date of the first meningococcal infection (i.e., patients were censored when they developed the first meningococcal infection after registry enrollment). To compare the demographic and disease characteristics between patients who started P-Abx and those who did not (No P-Abx), data were summarized at the later of the eculizumab start date, P-Abx start date, or enrollment date for patients with P-Abx use or at the last eculizumab treatment follow-up for No P-Abx patients. Event rates and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated for meningococcal infections for patients with and those without P-Abx using Poisson regression with an offset for the log of the treatment duration. RESULTS As of January 8, 2019, 1,815 eculizumab-treated patients were enrolled in the International PNH Registry, of whom 1,231 met all inclusion criteria for this study. Of the eligible patients, 501 received P-Abx and 730 did not. For the P-Abx and No P-Abx groups, the mean age of PNH onset (37.3 vs 36.8 y, respectively) and mean age at eculizumab initiation (44.4 vs 43.1 y, respectively) were similar. P-Abx use was higher in Europe (76.6%) than in other regions (Table 1). Both P-Abx and No P-Abx groups had similar medical event histories; the mean duration of the study period was 4.3 years (SD, 2.28 years) for the P-Abx group and 3.8 years (SD, 2.48 years) for the No P-Abx group. The mean duration of P-Abx use during the study period was 0.4 years (SD, 1.01 years). The most commonly used P-Abx was penicillin (314 of 500 patients). In total, 7 patients (3 from the P-Abx group and 4 from the No P-Abx group) experienced a meningococcal infection during the study period. In these 7 patients, the mean time from meningococcal vaccination to eculizumab initiation was 0.7 months (SD, 0.23 months) for the P-Abx group and 2.4 months (SD, 1.20 months) for the No P-Abx group. The estimated rates of meningococcal infection per 100 PY were 0.1 (95% CI, 0.0-0.4) for the P-Abx group and 0.1 (95% CI, 0.1-0.4) for the No P-Abx group (Table 2). CONCLUSIONS Rates of meningococcal infection were consistent with previously reported rates and were similar in PNH patients who received eculizumab therapy with or without P-Abx. It is important to note the small number of meningococcal infections and the limited details of P-Abx use reported in the registry. Further work will assess if patients were on P-Abx at the time of infection, and what meningococcal serotypes were identified. Disclosures Patriquin: Apellis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ra Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kulasekararaj:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Achilleon: Consultancy; Ra Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Akari Therapeutics: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Peffault de Latour:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Wilson:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Jain:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Maciejewski:Alexion: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicComplement system in diseases→French-language works237,207→