MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2986061480 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-124743

Neutralizing and Non-Neutralizing Anti-FVIII Antibodies in Black and White Hemophilia A Subjects: A Natural History Profile

2019· article· en· W2986061480 on OpenAlexaff
Kathleen P. Pratt, Devi Gunasekera, Pooja Vir, Robert Peters, Siyuan Tan, Glenn F. Pierce, Cara Olsen, Saulius Butenas, Kenneth G. Mann

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Hemophilia Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntibodyEpitopePopulationHaplotypeImmunologyTiterMolecular biologyBiologyVirologyMedicineGenotypeGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most common complication in hemophilia A (HA) treatment, affecting 25-30% of severe HA patients, is the development of alloimmune inhibitors that foreclose the ability of infused factor VIII (FVIII) to participate in coagulation. Inhibitors confer significant pathology on affected individuals and present major complexities in their management. Inhibitors are more common in African American patients, and it has been hypothesized that this is a consequence of haplotype (H)-treatment product mismatch. F8 gene haplotypes H1-H5 are defined by combinations of nonsynonymous SNPs encoding FVIII sequence variants D1241E, M2238V and R484H. F8 haplotypes H2-H5 are more prevalent in individuals with black African ancestry, while >90% of the white population has the H1 haplotype. This study used a validated Luminex-based assay to determine total anti-FVIII antibody titers in plasma from 395 HA (189 black, 206 white) and 23 non-HA control subjects, measuring their binding to recombinant full-length H1 and H2 and B-domain-deleted (BDD) H1/H2, H3 and H4 FVIII proteins. Inhibitor titers were determined using a chromogenic Bethesda assay with the Nijmegen modification. Linear B-cell epitopes recognized by antibodies in human plasma samples were characterized using commercial peptide microarrays with imprinted 15-mer peptides spanning the FVIII A1, A2, C1 and C2 domains, with binding interactions detected using fluorescent-labeled anti-human IgG antibodies. Neither total nor inhibitory antibody titers correlated with F8 haplotype. FVIII peptides with the D1241E and M3348V polymorphisms showed low antibody reactivity, indicating they do not comprise linear B-cell epitopes. Similarly, antibodies from subjects with H3 and H5 haplotypes, who were necessarily infused with FVIII products having a different haplotype than that of their endogenous, (dysfunctional) F8 sequence, did not show haplotype-correlated differential binding to the three BDD-FVIII or full-length FVIII proteins, indicating the polymorphic M2238V or D1241E sites do not correspond to immunodominant, conformational B-cell epitopes. Interestingly, the BDD-FVIII proteins were significantly more reactive with antibodies in plasma than were two commercial full-length recombinant FVIII products. Overall, results of this study indicated that low-titer FVIII-reactive antibodies are readily detected in most HA subjects and in a majority of healthy non-HA controls. The observed stronger immunoreactivity of BDD-FVIII suggests that B-domain removal exposes novel B-cell epitopes, perhaps through conformational rearrangements of FVIII domains. Disclosures Pratt: Bloodworks NW: Patents & Royalties: inventor on patents related to FVIII immunogenicity; Grifols, Inc: Research Funding. Peters:Sanofi: Employment. Mann:Haematologic Technologies: Other: Owner; Stago: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; Baxalta: Consultancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHemophilia Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207