MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quaternary buried valley characterization on the Canadian Prairies using a shear land-streamer

2019· article· en· W2986072110 on OpenAlexaffabout
David G. Schieck, Robert B. Hearst

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsGeoscience BC
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeophoneBedrockSeismologySeismic vibratorSeismometerLithologyReflection (computer programming)Remote sensingGeomorphologyPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SummaryA 72 channel 3-component land-streamer in conjunction with an IVI Envirovibe modified with a transverse shearpack has been constructed and tested over a known >70 m Quaternary buried valley system SE of Calgary, Alberta. Recent near surface seismic reflection developments using a land-streamer have been commercialized in the Western Canadian Prairies repurposing former exploration seismic equipment. Shear-shear reflection, P-wave reflection and multichannel analysis of surface wave (MASW) data are acquired concurrently using this cost-effective system. Processed data depicts detailed characteristics relative to cross-sections based on sparse water wells drilled to depth in this area. Real-time GPS to sub-meter accuracy, 24-bit distributed recording, advanced vibrator electronics and feedback using 3C analogue geophones all operated by a single observer while operating the Vibroseis machine is a novel approach for shallow seismic applications. This equipment and methodology demonstrate a cost-effective approach to soil investigations for near surface shear velocities, soil characterization, and detailed lithology of quaternary valleys within the Canadian Prairies to in-fill drill locations and airborne geophysical methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASEG Extended AbstractsSame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207