MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

P18 Airwave oscillometry in relation to patient reported outcomes in asthma

2019· article· en· W2986222819 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
CRW Kuo, Brian J. Lipworth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaAirway resistanceExacerbationQuality of life (healthcare)Internal medicineCardiologyBasal (medicine)Anesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Airwave oscillometry (AOS: Tremoflo, Thorasys, Montreal) uses a vibrating mesh to superimpose forced oscillations of sound waves on top of normal tidal breathing to measure respiratory impedance as lung resistance (R) and reactance (X). AOS is able to determine the degree of small airways dysfunction as either peripheral airway resistance (R5-R19) or compliance as area under the reactance curve (AX). We therefore investigated the relationship of AOS to patient reported outcomes of asthma control (ACQ) and quality of life (mAQLQ). In particular, we were interested in ACQ which is a strong predictor of future exacerbation risk. Patients and methods We evaluated 46 patients with persistent asthma: Age 51 yr, FEV1 87%, R5 142%, ICS (BDP equiv) 616 µg, 65% taking LABA, 11%, LAMA, 37% LTRA. Using a cut point for R5-R19 of 0.08 kPa/l/s, there were differences (<0.08 vs ≥0.08 kPa/l/s) in mean ACQ values: 0.99 vs 1.93 (95%CI -1.66, -0.45) (Fig) and in mAQLQ (symptoms): 5.23 vs 4.30 (CI 0.10, 1.74). For AX with a cut point of 1.0 kPa/l there were differences in ACQ: 0.99 vs 1.93 (CI -1.55, -0.33), in mAQLQ symptoms: 5.28 vs 4.42 (CI 0.06, 1.66) and mAQLQ activity: 5.92 vs 5.01 (CI 0.004, 1.81). For the R5-R19 there was also a difference in FeNO: 30 vs 45 ppb (CI 13, 17). For FEV1 cut point of 80% pred differences were seen in ACQ: 2.20 vs 1.27 (CI 0.11, 1.76) and mAQLQ symptoms: 4.05 vs 5.09 (CI -1.93, -0.16) but not FeNO. For FEF25–75 cut point of 50% pred there were differences in ACQ 1.90 vs 1.23 (CI 0.003, 1.34) and FeNO 60 vs 35 ppb (CI 3, 48). Differences for ACQ and mAQLQ all exceeded the respective MCID’s of 0.5. Conclusions Peripheral lung resistance and compliance measured by AOS are related to patient reported outcomes of asthma control and quality of life as well as to type 2 inflammation. We propose that measuring AOS should compliment spirometry as part of the routine work up of asthma patients in a real life clinic setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAsthma and respiratory diseases→French-language works237,207→