MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2986500031 · doi:10.1016/j.njas.2019.100312

Insects as feed: Gendered knowledge attitudes and practices among poultry and Pond Fish farmers in Kenya

2019· article· en· W2986500031 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Elizabeth Waithanji, D. Hippolyte Affognon, Samuel Wairia King'ori, Gracious Diiro, Dorothy Nakimbugwe, Komi K. M. Fiaboe

Bibliographic record

VenueNJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Centre for International Agricultural ResearchInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsFish <Actinopterygii>ManureCommercial fish feedFish farmingFisheryBiologyAgricultural scienceToxicologyAquacultureEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highlights• Women and men shared fish and poultry chores, with women doing them for longer.• Men and women’s knowledge on insects fed raw to chicken and fish was similar.• Animal manure induced zoo planktons were main fish feed given by women and men.• Women used more home-plant based complementary fish feeds, and men more commercial.• According to men, insect-fed-chickens are bigger, and for women they are tastier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life SciencesSame topicInsect Utilization and EffectsFrench-language works237,207