MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2986521117

All-Cause Mortality Amongst Patients Undergoing Above and Below Knee Amputation in a Regional Vascular Centre within 2014-2015.

2019· article· en· W2986521117 on OpenAlexaff
Gem Kennedy, Kevin McGarry, Gladyce H. Bradley, Denis W. Harkin

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Artery Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAmputationCOPDDiabetes mellitusSurgeryKidney diseaseRetrospective cohort studyDeep veinVascular diseaseDiabetic footHeart failureCohortThrombosisMortality rateInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Major lower limb amputation remains a common treatment for patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) in whom other measures have failed. It has been associated with high morbidity and mortality, including risks from venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: A two-year retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 79 patients who underwent major lower limb amputation (below- or above-knee amputation) between January 2014 and December 2015 in a single tertiary referral centre. Amputation procedures were performed for reasons relating to complications of PVD and/or diabetes mellitus. Patients were followed-up to investigate all-cause mortality rates and VTE events using the Northern Ireland Electronic Care Record database (mean follow-up time 17 months). RESULTS: Of the 79 patients, there were 52 male and 27 female. Mean age at time of surgery was 72 years (range 34-99 years). Forty-six patients (58%) suffered from diabetes mellitus, 29 (35%) heart failure, 31 (39%) chronic kidney disease (CKD) and 10 (13%) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Twenty patients (25%) were on anticoagulant therapy, and 53 (67%) were on antiplatelet therapy.Thirty-five patients (44%) died during follow-up; mean age at death was 74 years. No statistically significant association was found between mortality rate and the level of amputation (p=0.3702), gender (p=0.3507), or comorbid diabetic mellitus (p=0.1127), heart failure (p=0.1028), CKD (p=0.0643) or COPD (p=0.4987).Two patients experienced radiologically-confirmed non-fatal pulmonary emboli and two patients developed radiologically-confirmed deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: The results are in agreement with current literature that amputation is associated with significant mortality, with almost half of the study population dying during follow-up. Further work should explore measures by which mortality rates may be reduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207