MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2986567088 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-126035

Pioneer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Study of Avapritinib in Patients with Indolent or Smoldering Systemic Mastocytosis with Symptoms Inadequately Controlled with Standard Therapy

2019· article· en· W2986567088 on OpenAlexaff
Cem Akin, Vito Sabato, Jason Gotlib, Mariana Castells, Michael W. Deininger, Hanneke Oude Elberink, Mark Heaney, Paul Van Daele, Deepti Radia, Massimo Triggiani, Daniel J. DeAngelo, Iván Álvarez‐Twöse, Sigurd Broesby‐Olsen, Tracy I. George, Karin Hartmann, Frank Siebenhaar, Andreas Reiter, Peter Vadas, Patrizia Bonadonna, Jens Panse, Petra Staubach, Knut Brockow, Diamant Thaçi, Huimin Lin, A. Morrison, Brenton G. Mar, Marcus Maurer

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMast cells and histamine
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSystemic mastocytosisTolerabilityAdverse effectInternal medicineMast cellMucositisCutaneous MastocytosisNeutropeniaGastroenterologyOncologyPharmacologyImmunologyToxicity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The gain-of function mutation KIT D816V plays a central role in the pathogenesis of systemic mastocytosis (SM). Among subtypes of SM, indolent SM (ISM) is the most frequent and is associated with normal/near-normal life expectancy; smoldering SM (SSM) is a subtype with a relatively higher burden of mast cells and may be associated with an increased risk of progression to advanced mastocytosis. However, both ISM and SSM patients may experience severe symptoms associated with mast cell mediator release, such as pruritus, diarrhea, anaphylaxis, and bone pain, which can be severely debilitating and have a profoundly negative impact on quality of life. Symptomatic treatments (eg, antihistamines and corticosteroids) are used to control symptoms with varying degrees of efficacy; however, these treatments fail to impact mast cell burden, and approved cytoreductive therapies for ISM or SSM are still lacking. There is an urgent unmet need for other treatment options in patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms who do not adequately respond to symptomatic treatment. Avapritinib is a potent and selective investigational oral kinase inhibitor that targets KIT D816V and other KIT exon 17 mutations. Avapritinib has shown potent and selective in vivo activity against KIT D816V, robust growth inhibition in an in vivo mastocytoma model, and tolerability at active doses in toxicology and safety pharmacology studies. The 3-part, phase 2 PIONEER study is being conducted to identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in ISM (part 1), to investigate efficacy of avapritinib vs placebo in patients with ISM and SSM (part 2), and to further characterize the safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with avapritinib (part 3). Study Design and Methods: PIONEER (NCT03731260) is an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of patients with ISM or SSM whose symptoms are not adequately controlled by best supportive care (BSC). For inclusion, patients must have moderate-to-severe symptoms per total symptoms score (TSS) on the ISM-Symptom Assessment Form (SAF) and have failed to achieve symptom control for ≥1 baseline symptom measured by ISM-SAF with ≥2 therapies considered BSC. BSC may include treatments such as H1 and H2 blockers, proton pump inhibitors, corticosteroids, and mast cell stabilizers. The ISM-SAF is being developed specifically to assess symptoms in patients with ISM and SSM, and final validation will be based on data from part 1 of this study. The study includes 3 parts (Figure). Part 1 aims to identify the RP2D. Patients with ISM will be randomized to three avapritinib doses (25 mg, 50 mg, or 100 mg once daily) or placebo + BSC, stratified by baseline serum tryptase level and the presence/absence of skin lesions. The primary endpoint is R2PD, determined by efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics at each dose level, with a primary criterion of maximum reduction in ISM-SAF TSS at week 12. Secondary endpoints include changes in measures of mast cell burden, changes in measures of skin lesions, quality of life, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Part 1 will include approximately 40 patients, with 10 patients per cohort (avapritinib 25, 50, and 100 mg once daily and placebo). Dose investigation will be done in parallel, for a duration of 12 weeks. In part 2, patients with ISM or SSM will be randomized to the avapritinib RP2D or placebo + BCS to evaluate the efficacy of avapritinib vs placebo in reducing symptoms of ISM and SSM. Patients will be stratified by the same factors as in part 1 as well as by diagnosis (ISM vs SSM). The primary endpoint is mean change in ISM-SAF TSS from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints are the same as those in part 1. In part 2, enrollment of 32 patients per group (64 total) will have >90% power to detect superiority of avapritinib to placebo at reducing SM symptoms based on the difference in mean change in the ISM-SAF TSS at week 12 using a 2-sample t-test with a 1-sided type I error rate of 0.025. To account for possible missing data, 35 patients per group will be enrolled (72 total). Part 3 will evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of avapritinib in ISM and SSM in an open-label extension including patients who completed parts 1 or 2. The primary endpoint is long-term safety and efficacy, secondary objectives include change in TSS ISM-SAF and are similar to those evaluated in parts 1 and 2. Figure Disclosures Akin: University of Michigan: Employment; Michigan Allergy and Asthma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ECNM: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Blueprint: Consultancy, Research Funding; Up to Date: Patents & Royalties; LAD2 cell line: Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Consultancy; NIH: Patents & Royalties. Gotlib:Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Allakos: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Deceiphera: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Deininger:Blueprint: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sangamo: Consultancy; Humana: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; TRM: Consultancy; Sangoma: Consultancy; Fusion Pharma: Consultancy; Adelphi: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Heaney:Partner Therapeutics: Consultancy; Deciphera: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Blueprint: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy. van Daele:Erasmus MC, Rotterdam: Employment; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Radia:Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Triggiani:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Deciphera: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Blueprint: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. DeAngelo:Amgen, Autolus, Celgene, Forty-seven, Incyte, Jazzs, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda: Consultancy; Blueprint: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding. George:Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Deciphera: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Allakos: Consultancy. Hartmann:ALK-Abello: Consultancy; Bluepriont: Consultancy; Deciphera: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Euroimmun: Research Funding. Frank:Blueprint: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Allakos: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Reiter:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel reimbursement, Research Funding; Blueprint: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel reimbursement; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel reimbursement. Panse:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Blueprint Medicines: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thaci:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Medimmune: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Morphosis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Galderma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; DS-Biopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; UCB: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo-Smith Kline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Samsung: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lilly: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Almiral: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speak

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMast cells and histamineFrench-language works237,207