MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2986664629 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-131595

Arsenic Trioxide Abrogate MN1 Mediated RA-Resistance in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

2019· article· en· W2986664629 on OpenAlexaff
Diego A. Pereira‐Martins, Juan Luiz Coelho‐Silva, Isabel Weinhäuser, Luisa C A Koury, Raul Antônio Morais Melo, Rosane Bittencourt, Kátia Bórgia Barbosa Pagnano, Ricardo Pasqüini, Elenaide C. Nunes, Evandro M. Fagundes, Ana Glória, Fábio R. Kerbauy, Armand Keating, Martin S. Tallman, Raul C. Ribeiro, Richard Dillon, Arnold Ganser, Michael Heuser, Bob Löwenberg, Peter J.M. Valk, Miguel Á. Sanz, Nancy Berliner, Antonio R. Lucena‐Araujo, Eduardo Magalhães Rego

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArsenic trioxideAcute promyelocytic leukemiaMedicineLeukemiaArsenicCancer researchImmunologyChemistryBiologyRetinoic acidGeneticsCell culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Described as a well know marker of worse prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MN1 overexpression has been associated with inv(16) or EVI1 overexpression (Heuser et al., Blood 2007). The promoter region of the MN1 gene has Retinoic Acid Response Elements (RAREs), and higher levels of MN1 expression have been associated with decreased response to retinoic acid (RA) in vitro. Nevertheless, in the context of acute promyelocytic leukemia, little is known about MN1 gene expression and functionality in vivo. Aims: Here, we investigated the effects of in vitro treatment with RA plus arsenic trioxide (ATO) in APL cell lines and primary blasts overexpressing MN1. Additionally, we quantified MN1 expression and correlated its levels with treatment outcome in a cohort of patients enrolled in the International Consortium on Acute Leukemia (ICAPL2006) study. Methods: Primary leukemic blasts from hCG-PMLRARα transgenic mice (TM; n=2) and APL patients (age, 36-45y; n=2) were transduced with MN1 or empty vector (EV, control) to evaluate cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Confirmatory assays were performed using transduced NB4 and NB4R2 (RA-resistant) cell lines. After synchronization using double thymidine block, transduced cells were submitted to proliferation and clonogenic (treated with RA and ATO, as well) assays. To evaluate the apoptotic rate, cells were treated with ATO (1 µM) alone or in combination with RA (1 µM each), for 24, 48 and 72 hours. The granulocytic differentiation in response to RA treatment alone (1 µM) or in combination with ATO (1 µM) was evaluated based on the CD11b and CD11c surface levels. In addition, 116 patients (age, 18-82y; 51% males) with newly diagnosed APL enrolled in the ICAPL2006 study were included. To validate our data, Bootstrap resampling procedure with 1000 repetitions from the original database was performed to assess the model bias. Results: Primary APL cells transduced with MN1 (from TM/APL patients) presented higher proliferation rates compared to controls (P<.05). Similarly, the overexpression of MN1 in APL cell lines was associated with increased proliferation (P=.001) and clonogenicity (P<.05). Furthermore, NB4-MN1 cells are able to form colonies in the presence of RA (1 µM) (P<.01) but not under ATO (1 µM) treatment (P>.05), while NB4R2-MN1 cells were able to form colonies in the presence of ATO (P<.05). To investigate whether MN1 promotes resistance to drug-induced apoptosis, we treated lentivirally transduced cells with RA plus ATO for 72 hours. No differences were founded between the MN1-transduced and the EV cells (P>.05). In accordance with our results using primary APL samples, ATO treatment (alone or in combination with RA) does not modulate the drug-induced apoptosis in a time-dependent manner in NB4 and NB4R2-MN1 cells (P<.05). For NB4 cells, the differentiation rate was lower in MN1-expressing cells under RA alone or in combination with ATO for 48 hours (P<.05), although these effects were abrogated after 72 hours of RA and ATO treatment. In contrast, NB4R2-MN1 cells exhibited decreased differentiation rate at 48 and 72 hours in presence of RA alone or in combination with ATO, in comparison with EV cells (P<.05). In the clinical setting, the retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the ICAPL2006 study revealed that the baseline characteristics were similar between patients with low and high MN1 levels. According to PETHEMA/GIMEMA criteria for predicting relapse, 34% and 46% of patients assigned to the low- and high-MN1 groups were deemed high-risk patients, respectively (P=.045). High MN1 expression was associated with lower 5-y Disease-Free Survival rates (74%; 95% CI: 69-91%)(HR: 2.61, 95% CI: 0.86-8.36) and Cumulative Incidence of Relapse (25%; 95% CI: 13-34%) (HR: 2.27, 95% CI: 0.75-6. 8). Bootstrap analysis for internal validation resulted in an AUC (0.63, 95% CI: 0.57-0.809) very similar to the original described data. Conclusion: We show that MN1 is relevant for RA-induced differentiation both in vitro and in vivo and may be involved in RA-resistance. Additionally, treatment with ATO circumvented the differentiation blockage in MN1 cells. Disclosures Pagnano: Sandoz: Consultancy; Pint Pharma: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Tallman:International Conference in Leukemia: Honoraria; 14th Annual Miami Cancer Meeting: Honoraria; New Orleans Summer Cancer Conference: Honoraria; Indy Hematology Review: Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Arog Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Cellerant Therapeutics: Research Funding; Orsenix: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Mayo Clinic: Honoraria; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nohla: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Salzberg Weill Cornall MSKCC Seminar in Hematologic Malignancies: Honoraria; BioSight: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KAHR: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; University of Oklahoma Medical Center: Honoraria; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Danbury Hospital Tumor Board: Honoraria; Hematology Oncology of Indiana: Honoraria. Dillon:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; TEVA: Consultancy, Honoraria. Heuser:Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin: Research Funding; Synimmune: Research Funding. Löwenberg:Up-to-Date", section editor leukemia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELYAD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chairman Scientific Committee and Member Executive Committee, European School of Hematology (ESH, Paris, France): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chairman, Leukemia Cooperative Trial Group HOVON (Netherlands: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Clear Creek Bio Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Editorial Board "European Oncology & Haematology": Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Elected member, Royal Academy of Sciences and Arts, The Netherlands: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Frame Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Royal Academy of Sciences and Arts, The Netherlands: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Supervisory Board, National Comprehensive Cancer Center (IKNL), Netherland: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207