MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2986991266 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2003339117

Immune signatures of prodromal multiple sclerosis in monozygotic twins

2020· article· en· W2986991266 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa Ann Gerdes, Claudia Janoschka, Maria Eveslage, Bianca Mannig, Timo Wirth, Andreas Schulte‐Mecklenbeck, Sarah Lauks, Laura Glau, Catharina C. Groß, Eva Tolosa, Andrea Flierl‐Hecht, Birgit Ertl‐Wagner, Frederik Barkhof, Sven G. Meuth, Tania Kümpfel, Heinz Wiendl, Reinhard Hohlfeld, Luisa Klotz

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity College LondonNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
KeywordsMultiple sclerosisSubclinical infectionImmune systemDiseaseImmunologyMonozygotic twinAutoimmune diseasePopulationBiologyMedicineGeneticsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease shaped by genetic and environmental factors. Because of the heterogeneity of the human population, it has been difficult to identify “immune signatures” of the disease. Here we investigated a cohort of identical twin pairs who are discordant for multiple sclerosis. In each twin pair, the immune signatures were remarkably similar, pointing to a strong influence of shared genetic and environmental factors. However, when we focused on a subgroup of seemingly healthy cotwins who showed subtle signs of “subclinical neuro-inflammation,” we identified a distinct signature of memory T cells. Insight into the immunological mechanisms associated with the initiation of the disease is relevant not only to the therapy but also for prevention of the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207