Longitudinal volume changes of hippocampal subfields and cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuropathological studies have shown that the hippocampus is affected in Parkinson's disease (PD) with cognitive impairment. Our goal was to assess the longitudinal volume change of different hippocampal subfields in PD patients with and without cognitive decline using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A total of 28 nondemented PD patients and 27 neurologically unimpaired elderly controls were enrolled in this study, and three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted MRI was performed. All PD patients that were followed up and rescanned after 2 years were divided into two groups: PD without cognitive decline (n=15) and PD with cognitive decline (n=13). A Bayesian model implemented in FreeSurfer was used to segment the hippocampal subfields automatically. Scale for global cognitive status included the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). RESULTS: In the cross sectional study, the bilateral hippocampal volume was smaller in PD patients compared to healthy controls, and the bilateral subiculum, CA2/3, CA4, and molecular layer (ML) subfields, and the right granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus (GC-DG) subfield, were significantly decreased in the PD patients. Significant correlations were found between the MoCA score and total hippocampus volume in PD patients. In the follow-up group, bilateral CA4, ML, and GC-DG subfields, and left CA2/3 and right presubiculum subfields, were significantly smaller in PD patients with cognitive decline compared to PD patients without cognitive decline. Significant correlations were found between the longitudinal change of the MMSE or MoCA scores and percent change rate of total bilateral hippocampal, bilateral ML, and right CA4 in all PD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated the selective regional vulnerability of the hippocampus in the progression of PD. These findings corroborate neuropathological findings and add novel information about the involvement of the hippocampus in the cognitive dysfunction of PD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".