MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2987332781 · doi:10.1542/neo.6-4-e196

Index of suspicion in the nursery

2005· article· en· W2987332781 on OpenAlexaff
Adam Cheng, Anthony Iacolucci, Hilary Whyte

Bibliographic record

VenueNeoReviews · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumothorax, Barotrauma, Emphysema
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesiaHeart rateRespiratory rateNeonatal intensive care unitEveningContinuous positive airway pressureApgar scoreAuscultationPeak inspiratory pressureGestationBlood pressurePregnancyFetusRespiratory systemPediatricsCardiologyInternal medicineTidal volume

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 2,216-g baby boy is born at 37 weeks’ gestation to a 34-year-old gravida 2, para 1 female. The pregnancy was uncomplicated until the day prior to delivery, when a biophysical profile score of 4/8 was obtained on assessment. Fetal heart rate decelerations to 80 beats/min and multiple late decelerations were noted the evening of delivery, and an emergent cesarean section is planned. The male infant is delivered precipitously prior to entering the operating room. Placental abruption is evident after delivery. At birth, the baby is limp but has spontaneous respirations, with a respiratory rate of 60 breaths/min. Mild intercostal retractions are evident. Femoral pulses are weak, but the heart rate is detected at 130 beats/min. On auscultation, heart sounds are not audible. Apgar scores are 7, 7, and 8 at 1, 5, and 10 minutes, respectively. Shortly after initial assessment, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is applied at 4 to 5 cm H2O, and the baby is transported to the neonatal intensive care unit where the blood pressure is 44/16 mm Hg (mean, 27 mm Hg) and the oxygen saturation is 98% (with CPAP). Color and tone are poor, and the baby subsequently receives bag-and-mask ventilation and a bolus of 10 mL/kg normal saline via a peripheral intravenous …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeoReviewsSame topicPneumothorax, Barotrauma, EmphysemaFrench-language works237,207