Distal Cervical Spondylotic Amyotrophy: Case Reports Demonstrating Clinical/Imaging Segmental Discrepancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Monomelic pure motor amyotrophy may seem to be an ominous syndrome as it leads to consideration of motor neuron disease. We present a series of 3 very similar cases where unilateral pure distal lower motor neuron paresis and atrophy was limited to the C8-T1 myotomes, without long-tract signs. Electrodiagnostic studies were in keeping with a restricted anterior horn cell disorder. Neuroimaging showed very focal spinal cord compression at the C6-7 level. Two patients underwent surgical decompression. All 3 patients were improved or stable at follow-up. Distal spondylotic amyotrophy is characterized by equal involvement of thenar and hypothenar muscles, in contrast to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or Hirayama disease. We discuss the striking 2-level discrepancy between imaging and clinical localization. Proposed explanations are arterial or venous compromise caudal to the site of compression. Anatomical variation such as a prefixed brachial plexus is unlikely. A similar imaging/clinical discrepancy has been documented in Hirayama disease and spondylotic myelopathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".