MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2987742329 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noz175.774

PDCT-13. ENTRECTINIB IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH RECURRENT OR REFRACTORY SOLID TUMORS INCLUDING PRIMARY CNS TUMORS

2019· article· en· W2987742329 on OpenAlexaff
Giles Robinson, Ami V. Desai, Karen Gauvain, Ellen M. Basu, Kathleen Dorris, Luke Maese, Amit J. Sabnis, Jennifer H. Foster, Suzanne Shusterman, Janet Yoon, Brian Weiss, Mohamed S Abdelbaki, Mufiza Farid‐Kapadia, Georgina Meneses‐Lorente, Alison K. Cardenas, Katherine E. Hutchinson, Guillaume Bergthold, Edna Chow Maneval, Elizabeth Fox, Amar Gajjar

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineROS1Internal medicineResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsRefractory (planetary science)OncologyPopulationPhases of clinical researchGastroenterologyClinical trialCancerAdenocarcinoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The phase 1/2 STARTRK-NG trial is evaluating entrectinib, a CNS-penetrant oral inhibitor of TRK, ROS1 and ALK tyrosine kinases, in children with solid tumors, including primary CNS tumors. Eligible patients are ≤22y with recurrent/refractory solid tumors. The recommended dose was determined in all-comers, and then expansion cohorts of CNS and solid tumors with NTRK1/2/3, ROS1 or ALK gene fusions, and neuroblastomas (NBL) regardless of mutation spectrum, were enrolled. Investigator-assessed response was classified as complete (CR) or partial response (PR), stable (SD) or progressive disease using RANO (CNS), RECIST (solid tumors), or Curie score (NBL). By the clinical data cut-off, 01 April 2019, 32 patients were enrolled. As of 31 Oct 2018 (enrollment data cut-off), 29 patients were enrolled and included in the evaluable population. Median age was 7y (range 4.9m to 20y). Entrectinib was well tolerated; phase 1 dose-limiting toxicities were: elevated creatinine, dysgeusia, fatigue, and pulmonary edema. The recommended dose was 550mg/m2 daily; all responses occurred at doses ≥400mg/m2. In 6 patients with high-grade CNS tumors, all gene-fusion-positive, ORR was 100% (Investigator-assessed responses): 2 CR (ETV6-NTRK3, EML1-NTRK2); 4 PR (TPR-NTRK1, KANK1-NTRK2, EEF1G-ROS1, GOPC-ROS1). In extracranial solid tumors 6/8 had a fusion; of these, 2 achieved a confirmed CR (DCTN1-ALK, ETV6-NTRK3), and 4 achieved PR (ETV6-NTRK3, EML4-NTRK3, TFG1-ROS1, KIF5B-ALK). Central imaging review is being performed and will be provided. Duration of therapy ranged from 0.2 to 22.2 months for all 32 patients. In responding patients, time to response ranged from 1 to 8.3 months. In children with refractory CNS tumors harboring NTRK1/2/3 or ROS1 fusions, entrectinib produced striking, rapid, and durable responses. No responses were seen in tumors lacking target gene fusions. These results support the continued evaluation of entrectinib in solid tumors with target gene fusions, especially high-grade CNS neoplasms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.907

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207