MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2987848490 · doi:10.18174/503107

Development of a conceptual framework to evaluate organic fertilisers : assessment on soil quality and agronomic, environmental and economics aspects

2019· report· en· W2987848490 on OpenAlexaff
O.F. Schoumans, P.A.I. Ehlert, Marjoleine Hanegraaf, P.F.A.M. Römkens, A.M. Pustjens, T.J. de Koeijer, H.C. de Boer, C. Nienhuis, H.J.M. Kortstee, A.B. Smit

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsImpact
FundersMinisterie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit
KeywordsSoil qualityQuality (philosophy)Environmental scienceAgricultural engineeringSoil waterEngineeringSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organische stof wordt algemeen beschouwd als een belangrijke factor om de kwaliteit van de bodem van landbouwgrond te handhaven en te verbeteren.Er bestaat echter vooralsnog geen systemisch kader om de bodemchemische, -fysische, -biologische en economische aspecten te evalueren met betrekking tot de toepassing van organische bemestingsproducten.Mede als gevolg van de transitie van een lineaire economie naar een circulaire economie zullen veel nieuwe organische producten op de markt komen die voortkomen uit de be-en verwerking van verschillende organische reststromen, zoals slib van afvalwater, mestoverschot en voedselresten.Dit rapport geeft een overzicht voor de karakterisering van zowel de organische meststoffen, alsmede de impact op de bodemkwaliteit met daaraan gekoppeld de agronomische, milieukundige, gezondheid en economische aspecten.Ten slotte worden de belangrijkste kennislacunes en ontbrekende methoden vermeld om de duurzaamheidsaspecten van nieuwe organische meststoffen in kaart te brengen.Dergelijke informatie is relevant zowel voor agrariërs ten aanzien van gebruik van organisch meststoffen als voor financiers en grondeigenaren ten aanzien van de kwaliteit van de bodem als voor beleidsmakers ten aanzien van wet-en regelgeving ten aanzien van toelating.Organic matter is widely recognised as an important factor in maintaining and improving soil quality in agricultural land.However, there is no systemic framework or approach to quantify soil's chemical-, physical-, biological-and economic aspects.Furthermore, due to the introduction of the circular economy, many new organic fertiliser products are becoming available.These products are derived from several organic waste streams, such as sewage-sludge, surplus manure and food-waste.This report describes an approach that can be used to evaluate the effect of applying organic fertilisers on the impact on soil quality, agronomy, the environment and human-health.Finally, the main knowledge gaps and missing methods to assess sustainability aspects of new organic fertilisers are mentioned.Such information is relevant both for farmers (who might ask: "what will I get?"), financers and landlords (who might ask: "what is the effect on land value?"), as well as for policy makers (who might ask: "how could legislation aspects be dealt with?").

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisFrench-language works237,207