Apathy rating scores and β-amyloidopathy in patients with Parkinson disease at risk for cognitive decline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To determine whether β-amyloidopathy correlates with apathy rating scores independently of mood changes and other neurodegenerative processes in Parkinson disease (PD). Methods In this cross-sectional study, patients with PD (n = 64, 48 male and 16 female, mean age 69.2 ± 6.7 years, Hoehn & Yahr stage 2.7 ± 0.5, Montreal Cognitive Assessment score 25.3 ± 3.0) underwent [11C]Pittsburgh compound B β-amyloid, [11C]dihydrotetrabenazine vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2), and [11C]methyl 4 piperidinyl propionate acetylcholinesterase brain PET imaging and clinical assessments, including the Marin Apathy Evaluation Scale, Clinician Version. Patients were recruited on the basis of having at least 1 risk factor for PD dementia, but they were excluded if they had dementia. Results Mean apathy rating score was 25.4 ± 6.4, reflecting predominantly subclinical apathy. Apathy rating scale scores correlated with amyloid binding, cognitive, depressive, and anxiety scores but not significantly with age, duration of disease, striatal VMAT2, or cholinergic binding. Multiple regression analysis model (p < 0.0001) showed significant regressor effects for global β-amyloid burden (p = 0.0038) with significant covariate effects for global cognitive z scores (p = 0.028) and for anxiety (p = 0.038) but not with depressive scores. Voxel-based analysis showed robust correlation between apathy rating scale scores and β-amyloid binding in bilateral nuclei accumbens, inferior frontal, and cingulate cortices (family-wise error rate–corrected p < 0.005). Conclusion Apathy is independently associated with β-amyloidopathy in patients with PD at risk of dementia. Regional brain findings are most robust for β-amyloidopathy in the nuclei accumbens, inferior frontal, and cingulate regions. Findings may provide an explanation for the often treatment-refractory nature of apathy in advancing PD despite optimized dopaminergic and antidepressant pharmacotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01565473.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".