MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2987916572 · doi:10.1115/gt2019-90158

A Methodology and Case Study of Outboard Traverse Flame Detection on Aeroderivative Gas Turbines

2019· article· en· W2987916572 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Roch Jacques, Noor Azman Mohamat Nor

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 9: Oil and Gas Applications; Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles; Wind Energy · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsSiemens (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraverseCombustorCombustionGas burnerAutomotive engineeringIndustrial gasThermocoupleGas turbinesMechanical engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental scienceElectrical engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Outboard-traverse flame migration in an annular profile, combustion gas pathway of a Siemens aero-derivative turbine engine can be detected with a dual immersion thermocouple. This solution is applicable for Oil & Gas operators using gas turbines fueled by natural gas. The typical flame profile within the annular combustion gas flow path is disturbed by introducing poor quality fuel into the engine. The skewed or outward bias flame profile in turn causes severe overheating of the hot section components around the outer radius of the annular combustor exit wall covering a number of hot section components. This ultimately causes accelerated components deterioration and failure to meet its target design life. Consequently, resulting in rejection of these components and increasing the life cycle cost of their asset operations. The introduction of the dual immersion thermocouple allow us to detect outward bias flame pattern using the exhaust gas temperature profile during operation and warn the operator of this condition via software alarm and trip provision. By implementing a means of detecting outward bias flame patterns, the operator will be made aware of this condition and can then take means to resolve this matter by first, allowing to optimize hot section components boundary limits and saving overhaul costs and second, avoid unplanned maintenance outages due to hot section premature failures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 9: Oil and Gas Applications; Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles; Wind EnergySame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207