Pemanfaatan Energi Alternatif di SMAN 1 Labuapi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Counselling about the use of alternative energy has been carried out at SMAN 1 Labuapi as a partner. This counselling needs to be done because based on the analysis of the situation, the people around SMAN 1 Labuapi desperately need energy assistance. Meanwhile, in the area around the SMAN 1 Labuapi, there is plenty of alternative energy. Therefore, the main purpose of implementing community service is to motivate the community, especially the community of SMAN 1 Labuapi, to be able to provide their own energy. Then, it is hoped that SMAN 1 Labuapi is expected to provide a model of alternative energy utilization to meet the energy needs of the wider community of Desa Labuapi continuously. The method used in this service is the method of counselling and demonstration about the use of alternative energy. The results of service are changes in the behaviour of the people of SMAN 1 Labuapi to utilize alternative energy. One tool that had been practised was a biogas maker unit using gallons of Narmada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".