MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2987970096 · doi:10.29303/jkp.v1i3.32

Pemanfaatan Energi Alternatif di SMAN 1 Labuapi

2019· article· en· W2987970096 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL KARYA PENGABDIAN · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnvironmental Engineering and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService (business)Unit (ring theory)Community serviceEnergy (signal processing)EngineeringOperations managementMathematicsMathematics educationBusinessPolitical scienceMarketingStatisticsPublic relations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Counselling about the use of alternative energy has been carried out at SMAN 1 Labuapi as a partner. This counselling needs to be done because based on the analysis of the situation, the people around SMAN 1 Labuapi desperately need energy assistance. Meanwhile, in the area around the SMAN 1 Labuapi, there is plenty of alternative energy. Therefore, the main purpose of implementing community service is to motivate the community, especially the community of SMAN 1 Labuapi, to be able to provide their own energy. Then, it is hoped that SMAN 1 Labuapi is expected to provide a model of alternative energy utilization to meet the energy needs of the wider community of Desa Labuapi continuously. The method used in this service is the method of counselling and demonstration about the use of alternative energy. The results of service are changes in the behaviour of the people of SMAN 1 Labuapi to utilize alternative energy. One tool that had been practised was a biogas maker unit using gallons of Narmada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it