Vegetation associations of the endangered <i>Opuntia cespitosa</i> (Prickly Pear, Cactaceae) and microsite variation in Point Pelee National Park, Ontario, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many Opuntia engage in nurse associations. Opuntia cespitosa is an endangered cactus species in Canada that is infrequent to rare in many parts of its US range. This study quantifies Opuntia cespitosa associations with other native and non-native plant species in its only substantial extant population in Canada, at Point Pelee National Park. Species cover was estimated along 100 transects across 50 Opuntia plants and in matched non-Opuntia transects. To determine Opuntia influence on its microsite, paired soil samples from under the cacti and near the cacti compared soil nutrients. Kruskal-Wallis tests, Wilcoxon Rank Signed tests and ANOVA tests compared microsites with and without cactus cover and compared groupings such as native/non-native status, growth form and life cycle. Soil moisture is low in the open, but higher yet variable under Opuntia. Opuntia soils have higher magnesium levels. Opuntia do not strongly favor any one species, but may be more beneficial to non-native species than to native ones. Poa compressa and other non-native graminoids were associated with Opuntia. Opuntia cespitosa, despite being at their northern range limit, do not appear to engage in facilitative associations with native species either as nurse or as protégé, but may be nursing non-native species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".