MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2988309127 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-128746

One-Year Efficacy and Safety from a Phase 3 Trial of Ravulizumab in Adult Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Receiving Prior Eculizumab Treatment

2019· article· en· W2988309127 on OpenAlexaff
Austin Kulasekararaj, Anita Hill, Saskia Langemeijer, Richard A. Wells, Fernando González-Fernández, Anna Gayà, Emilio Ojeda Gutierrez, Caroline Piatek, Lindsay Mitchell, Kensuke Usuki, Alberto Bosi, Robert A. Brodsky, Masayo Ogawa, Ji Yu, Stephan Ortiz, Alexander Röth, Jong-Wook Lee, Régis Peffault de Latour

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuriaEculizumabMedicineHemoglobinuriaClinical trialInternal medicinePediatricsAnemiaImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Ravulizumab, an innovative long-acting C5 complement inhibitor, was recently approved in the United States, Europe, and Japan for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). In the largest phase 3 study (ALXN1210-PNH-302; NCT03056040) in eculizumab-experienced PNH patients (pts), ravulizumab (q8w) was shown to be noninferior to eculizumab (q2w) after 26 wks for all primary and key secondary endpoints. At the end of the 26-wk treatment period, all pts had the option to receive weight-based dosing of ravulizumab in an extension for up to 2 y. We report on the efficacy and safety of ravulizumab through 52 wks of treatment. METHODS This was an extension of the open-label, phase 3, multicenter study described above. Adult PNH pts who were stable on eculizumab for ≥6 mo and with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) of ≤1.5xULN at screening were randomly assigned 1:1 to switch to ravulizumab or continue receiving eculizumab for 26 wks. After 26 wks, pts in the ravulizumab arm continued ravulizumab maintenance therapy (R-R arm), and pts in the eculizumab arm were switched to ravulizumab (E-R arm). For the 52-wk data, the primary efficacy endpoint was percent change in LDH from baseline (BL), and key secondary endpoints included the proportion of pts with breakthrough hemolysis (BTH), transfusion avoidance, improvement in FACIT-Fatigue total score, and stabilized hemoglobin (HGB-S) levels. Additional endpoints included change in plasma free C5 levels from BL and safety evaluations. RESULTS Of the 192 pts who received ravulizumab during the study, 191 entered the extension period (R-R arm: n=96; E-R arm: n=95). Pts in both groups showed a durable response for percentage change in LDH up to 52 wks, similar to what was observed during the first 26 wks (Figure A). At 52 wks, pts in the R-R arm had an 8.8% increase in LDH from baseline (standard deviation [SD], 29%), while pts in the E-R arm had 5.8% (SD, 27%) change in LDH from baseline. Mean LDH levels in both groups were maintained at 1.0xULN (<246 U/L). The proportion of pts who experienced BTH was low and stable over the 52-wk treatment with ravulizumab (Table). During wks 0-26, no pts in the R-R arm experienced BTH vs 3 during wks 27-52. In the E-R arm, 5 pts experienced BTH during wks 0-26 vs 1 in wks 27-52 after switching to ravulizumab. During wks 27-52, no BTH events were associated with free C5 of ≥0.5 μg/mL (threshold for complete C5 inhibition). The percentage of pts avoiding transfusion remained stable in the extension period (Table). During wks 0-26, 88% of pts in the R-R arm avoided transfusion vs 87% in wks 27-52; in the E-R arm, 83% (0-26 wks) vs 83% (27-52 wks) avoided transfusion. FACIT-Fatigue scores were maintained in both treatment groups through 52 wks. The proportion of pts with HGB-S was 76% in each arm during wks 0-26, and 81% in each arm during wks 27-52. All pts in the R-R arm continued to maintain free C5 of <0.5 μg/mL at all time points through 52 wks (n=96; Figure B). All pts in the ravulizumab treatment group continued to maintain free C5 of <0.5 μg/mL at all time points through 52 wks (n=96). In pts initially randomized to eculizumab, the switch to ravulizumab showed improved free C5 control, and no pts had free C5 of ≥0.5 µg/mL after the switch. During the extension, 79% in the R-R arm experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) vs 75% in the E-R arm. The most frequently reported TEAEs in the R-R arm were upper respiratory tract infection (URTI; 9 pts [9%]), and headache and nasopharyngitis (6 pts [6%] each). The most common TEAEs in the E-R arm were headache (10 pts [10%]), URTI (8 pts [8%]), and nasopharyngitis (7 pts [7%]). Eight pts (8%) in the R-R arm and 5 pts (5%) in the E-R arm experienced serious AEs; none led to discontinuation or death. No new treatment-emergent antidrug antibody-positive responses were reported during wks 27-52. There were no meningococcal infections, deaths, or discontinuations due to AEs. CONCLUSIONS Adult PNH pts receiving stable eculizumab therapy who received ravulizumab over 52 wks experienced durable efficacy; pts who received eculizumab for 26 wks and then switched to ravulizumab had an efficacy response consistent with pts in the R-R arm. All pts who had suboptimal free C5 control receiving eculizumab achieved complete free C5 inhibition after the switch to ravulizumab; no BTH events were associated with free C5 levels of ≥0.5 μg/mL. Ravulizumab continues to be well tolerated through wk 52 with no new safety concerns. Disclosures Kulasekararaj: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Achilleon: Consultancy; Ra Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Akari Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hill:Akari: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria; Bioverativ: Honoraria; Apellis: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Regeneron: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Ra Pharma: Honoraria. Wells:Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gonzalez-Fernandez:Alexion: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gaya:Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Piatek:Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dova: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Rigel: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding. Mitchell:Novartis: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria. Usuki:Alexion: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Brodsky:Achillion: Research Funding; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grant funding. Ogawa:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ortiz:Alexion: Employment. Röth:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lee:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Achillion: Research Funding. Peffault de Latour:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207