MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2988388863 · doi:10.1093/jnen/nlz105

Edward G. Stopa, MD, July 6, 1954–September 18, 2019

2019· article· en· W2988388863 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Suzanne M. de la Monte, John E. Donahue, Bassam I. Aswad

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr. Edward G. Stopa, neuropathologist, physician-scientist, and clinician, passed away peacefully on Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 65 years of age after a brief and courageous battle with pancreatic cancer. Ed was born and raised in Newark, New Jersey. He received his undergraduate degree in physiology in 1976 and medical degree in 1980 from McGill University in Montreal, Canada. He completed his residency in anatomic pathology and fellowship in neuropathology at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, an affiliate of the Harvard Medical School. In 1985, Ed was appointed Assistant Professor of Pathology at Tufts University School of Medicine. In 1989, he became assistant director of neuropathology and associate professor of pathology at the State University of New York Health Science Center in Syracuse. Then, in 1993, Dr. Stopa was appointed as Associate Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Neurosurgery at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. He also was appointed to the clinical staff at Lifespan’s Rhode Island Hospital and Miriam Hospital as Division Director of Neuropathology. In 2002, he was promoted to full professor in the Research Scholar track.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1620.090

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuropathology & Experimental NeurologySame topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207