Calling in the Self: Centering Socially Engaged Buddhism in Critical Pedagogy Through Personal Narrative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay troubles notions of critical pedagogy that promote binary and fragmented conceptions of identity and oppression, which tend to be hyper-rational and outward-focused. Socially Engaged Buddhism has much to offer critical pedagogy because it challenges the notion of a separate self, engaging in the work of justice and movement-building. It is as an embodied way of inner knowing that invites dis-identification with a separate self, thereby experiencing the self as interconnected. It also provides insight into the root causes of violence and oppression and a mechanism by which we can purify the root causes to avoid replication in new, subtle, and subversive ways. Critical pedagogy without embodied, contemplative practices create the illusion of systemic and structural change. Without awareness into the ways that our ego mind centers and re-centers a separate self, we unconsciously operate from a place of self-interest and self-protection, furthering individualism at the expense of collective liberation. This essay intentionally engages contemplative personal narrative to model the power of self-awareness in Socially Engaged Buddhism and the practice of calling in the self through insights gained by the author . I call for a more embodied, self-reflective approach to critical pedagogy at the individual level to support deeper and more sustained systemic transformation and movement building.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".