MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2988397660 · doi:10.1115/gt2019-91017

Power-Density vs Efficiency Trade-Off for a Recuperated Inside-Out Ceramic Turbine (ICT)

2019· article· en· W2988397660 on OpenAlexaff
B. Picard, A. Blais, Mathieu Picard, David Rancourt

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 8: Microturbines, Turbochargers and Small Turbomachines; Steam Turbines · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTurbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecuperatorTurbineHeat exchangerPower densityMechanical engineeringTurbopropNuclear engineeringThermal efficiencyCeramicMaterials scienceOverall pressure ratioAutomotive engineeringPower (physics)Environmental scienceEngineeringComposite materialGas compressorThermodynamicsPhysicsChemistryCombustion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recuperated cycles can significantly increase the efficiency of small gas turbines that are today operating with low pressure ratios and uncooled or lightly cooled turbine blades. However, for mass-driven applications such as aeroengines, the efficiency benefit is typically outweighed by the increased weight associated with the heat exchanger (HX). Increase in specific power could overcome this penalty by reducing the mass flow through the system and therefore its weight and size. To do so, the Turbine Inlet Temperature (TIT) must be increased by ∼250 K over state-of-the-art small gas turbines. The Inside-out Ceramic Turbine (ICT) propose a new path to increase TIT of small turbines, where blade cooling schemes are impractical and costly. This new architecture increases the achievable TIT by using ceramic blades loaded in compression under centrifugal loads supported by an air-cooled rotating composite rim. This paper provides a system-level evaluation of the power-density to efficiency trade-off for the sub-megawatt class turbines using the ICT configuration. The numerical simulation includes 3 submodels to provide cycle efficiency and mass estimates for various cycle and HX design: (1) a station-based thermodynamic model; (2) a 1D-FEM HX model for a straight counterflow recuperator; and (3) a system-level mass model of the recuperated engine configured for a turboprop or turboshaft. At a TIT of 1550 K, the optimal ICT configuration provides a power density of 3 kW/kg and 40% thermal efficiency, which is 4 times lighter than recuperated turbines at 1300 K for the same efficiency level. Further increase in TIT to 1800 K would reach current state-of-the-art turboprop power densities (up to 5 kW/kg) while still achieving over 40% thermal efficiency or — for applications where power density can be traded for efficiency — up to 50% thermal efficiency while maintaining low pressure ratios and associated simplicity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 8: Microturbines, Turbochargers and Small Turbomachines; Steam TurbinesSame topicTurbomachinery Performance and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207